Anonymous ID: 82ca21 Feb. 6, 2018, 9:31 a.m. No.286370   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6391

>>286336

The bottom part of the picture is incorrect.

 

The photographer was not directly above Beatty. We can see that it's about a 30-40 degree angle looking down over her shoulder at the phone. So when standing behind POTUS and looking towards the audience, the photographer was above and some distance to the left of Beatty.

Anonymous ID: 82ca21 Feb. 6, 2018, 9:44 a.m. No.286457   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>286391

>I thought the same thing, but don't think it detracts from the messageโ€ฆ

 

It won't for most people, but some people will spot the error and use it against the mission. The more accurate the graphic, then the more it hits home against the evil doers.

 

It'll clearly tell them that not only do we know that her cell phone was altered, but we can also point to that exact photographer in the audience.

 

Hit those fuckers hard with nothing but undeniable facts and 100% accurate graphics.

Anonymous ID: 82ca21 Feb. 6, 2018, 9:48 a.m. No.286480   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>286449

Yep.

 

Release the Dems' memo. Then release a follow-up memo. Then release the full report and all of the evidence, proving for a fact which memo is true.

 

Of course, the dems will still balk at the evidence and claim things are taken out of context or some other bullshit, but that's nothing new. When that fails they'll find some other distraction.

Anonymous ID: 82ca21 Feb. 6, 2018, 10:12 a.m. No.286653   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6657 >>6702

>>286597

>Massive DDOS, viruses activated, false flags, blue beam, anything and everything to prevent the truth from reaching us.

 

Brought to you by the same people behind the (active) 16-year plan to destroy the U.S. Attacking the Internet and home computers is nothing compared to the lengths that these people are willing to go.

Anonymous ID: 82ca21 Feb. 6, 2018, 10:23 a.m. No.286718   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6784

>>286628

The same Twitter that he spams all day long with either other people's political re-tweets or self-promotions for his book.

 

In the past 12 hours he's posted around 35 tweets / re-tweets. I enjoy his live videos, but it's a bit of a workout tolerating his Twitter spamming just to find out when he'll be broadcasting again.

Anonymous ID: 82ca21 Feb. 6, 2018, 10:33 a.m. No.286774   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>286702

>Even if it never happens, we should be prepared.

 

Absolutely.

 

One of the cheapest and easiest tools is a radio for your home/office. Back in the 1990s, local talk radio stations were mostly conservative and incredibly popular when helping to spread the truth about Clinton and other problems with government. Radio hosts were mostly informed, and callers could easily add to the conversations and add new information as well. If such an attack against the Internet was to take place, talk radio can once again be a critical tool for helping people stay informed to the truth.