>>2870389
They're running psyop botnets on Twitter. See
>>2870209
I hope they do get nailed by the SEC, but isn't Strzok's wife in charge there still? Maybe that's why they're doing all this with impunity–they know they can get away with it.
It goes to show the importance of reining in the executive branch first, as Q has stated. Obama left behind a field full of landmines ("firewalls").
I still think there's more to it, though. These people are willingly losing money because either they fear justice via POTUS, blackmail via the cabal, or a loss of financial support from the oligarchs that eclipses that of their customers. I think the first two are more likely.
I don't think idealism or values has anything to do with it; that's what they want people to believe, in order to put a noble shine on their craven maneuvers. Anyone that believes that is probably a little too inexperienced with business to understand that corporations don't get that large by pursuing their lofty notions of human dignity–they do what they do, then have their pr firm/ad division/media contacts spin horeshit into threads of gold.