Anonymous ID: 228682 Sept. 4, 2018, 2:10 a.m. No.2870338   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2870321

Deep web is a clusterfuck. You're better off trying different search engines; just search `google alternatives'. There's more options now than ever.

 

Since you're saying things have gotten worse, try gibiru.com, which is supposedly like google ten years ago (but private)

Anonymous ID: 228682 Sept. 4, 2018, 2:18 a.m. No.2870359   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2870335

I'm not blaming capitalism, I'm saying that the system is so corrupt that capitalism doesn't work. I should clarify and say that capitalism didn't make these oligarchs–cronyism, corruption and abuse of government power did. But it's to the point where the system isn't working, and needs to be remedied.

 

I've never in my life seen companies blatantly defy the will of consumers like this.

Anonymous ID: 228682 Sept. 4, 2018, 3:42 a.m. No.2870514   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0561

>>2870389

They're running psyop botnets on Twitter. See

>>2870209

 

I hope they do get nailed by the SEC, but isn't Strzok's wife in charge there still? Maybe that's why they're doing all this with impunity–they know they can get away with it.

 

It goes to show the importance of reining in the executive branch first, as Q has stated. Obama left behind a field full of landmines ("firewalls").

 

I still think there's more to it, though. These people are willingly losing money because either they fear justice via POTUS, blackmail via the cabal, or a loss of financial support from the oligarchs that eclipses that of their customers. I think the first two are more likely.

 

I don't think idealism or values has anything to do with it; that's what they want people to believe, in order to put a noble shine on their craven maneuvers. Anyone that believes that is probably a little too inexperienced with business to understand that corporations don't get that large by pursuing their lofty notions of human dignity–they do what they do, then have their pr firm/ad division/media contacts spin horeshit into threads of gold.

Anonymous ID: 228682 Sept. 4, 2018, 3:50 a.m. No.2870528   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0551

>>2870486

If you could find the average tenure of CEOs to companies, you could multiply that by the number of companies and you would have it. I know I've seen an article like that before, but it was years ago–I think during the Bush era, while people were bitching about 'golden parachutes'. I think it was a Conservative outlet playing Devil's Advocate.

Anonymous ID: 228682 Sept. 4, 2018, 3:59 a.m. No.2870551   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2870528

>>2870486

Here we go: for fortune 500 companies, the average CEO lasts 7.2 years. So that means that, on average, 69.4 CEOs would be leaving those 500 companies.

 

https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/02/12/ceo-tenure-rates/