Correct. Not the whole screen was overlayed, as some anons think. If they overlayed the whole screen why such a lousy job? They would make it look 'normal'.
Or the photographer saw it himself, or they did the job at gettys. One of them is complicit with treason for withholding/scrubbing of evidence of a treaseous crime.
Good job finding trying to find out.
Only, one thing bothers me… when someone said this out loud (it was audible enough for others in the room, I guess), why was there no commotion over it. It should have shocked some people. No visible reactions in the room.
(Just wondering.)
I see, but the text on her screen doesn't exactly match the end resulting piece she wrote. In other words, at that time she was still working on it. And why overlaying the whole screen? You clearly can see only that certain part blocked out.
But, in fact, it doesn't matter much what exactly was doctored. They scrubbed the real content. That's the important part.
Pop, goes the weasel…
The photos in the newspapers come from the same source, so all the same…
Been busy for many hours, found nothing other than this… we even asked AI anon for help, but he seems to be sleeping… 3(
Is that screaming sampled? It sounds like a friggin' football game… stupid people. They think they really can go to mars…
We're not worried about you, anon, you will be fine. It's the people who are still convinced we did go to the moon 50 years ago… and now think we go to mars.