Re-reading the Q drop:
Imagine THIS.
Raw intel collection.
Narrative FEEDER.
Narrative COLLECTORS.
Narrative DISTRIBUTORS.
LEAKS.
CLASSIFIED.
PAYMENTS.
FOREIGN ACCOUNTS.
CASH.
SPOOK FILES.
HOTELS.
BLACKMAIL.
How do you retain 'Freedom of the Press' if those in front of the camera [trusted by select viewers] are extensions of the ARM?
Freedom of the Press is VITAL to retain.
I suggest it might mean this:
Imagine THIS. = Hypothetical idea
Raw intel collection = any kind of intel collection.
Narrative FEEDER = Who usually tries to control the narrative? MSM. So in regards of ANY intel collected, the media usually attacks certain parts of it that they don't like. In this case, FEEDER could mean source of intel.
Narrative COLLECTORS = WHO found it.
Narrative DISTRIBUTORS = WHO told the public about it.
LEAKS.
CLASSIFIED.
PAYMENTS.
FOREIGN ACCOUNTS.
CASH.
SPOOK FILES.
HOTELS.
BLACKMAIL.
All seem to suggest some of the excuses the MSM uses to discredit any factual evidence.
How do you retain 'Freedom of the Press' if those in front of the camera [trusted by select viewers] are extensions of the ARM?
Freedom of the Press is VITAL to retain.
Freedom of the press is retained by normal American citizens doing the research and investigating. Think about it, pretty much ANY intel coming from ANY govt agency is generally viewed as potentially biased or politically motivated.
What if we the people are the ones who found the sources, collected it, and then disseminated it instead of the corrupt MSM?
Make sense?