WHO THE FUCK IS CHRIS HATH ARISEN AND SHIT!
YAY! ^_^
I caught this also.
She's holding her arm with a finger curled.
Wooooooow.
She doesn't even have her pinky up.
They're Japanese.
Their only thought was: "Black people… the ones who buy our shoes… they're into this shit… right? Sweet, let's be hip!"
Hey Chris!
Since you're lurking…
Rice and Kavanaugh both worked for Bush Dubya….
I wonder if that's how why they put her there… specifically…
Makes it harder to focus on Kavanaugh.
>Love it.
>Wouldn't miss the show.
>Hard to tell, the plan is incredible.
Hard to tell when the show starts?
Look for "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us……."
>No name replacement votes our side.
So long as the new guy's not a RINO.
But yes. So much yes.
>Other anons have called it.
A lot of things have been called… kek
>Once the SC is set up, Bush et al can start.
"So, who wants to stop all the corruption? 5-4, it ends now!"
>Can't pardon crimes like 911.
Did Obama pardon Bush/Cheney/et al or did Dubya do that himself?
>State Secrets?
>Insurance policy.
As a ticket out of the country or out of the fire?
Was that Strzok and Page's plan the whole time?
He'd be brazenly corrupt to make the Dems look ridiculous…
And Page would hand over the intel she had and that he'd been giving her in case Hillary lost… so save their necks?
>Is the insurance not blackmail but a copy of the pardons?
Makes more sense now that I typed out the previous part.
"DON'T HANG ME, I CAN PROVE CORRUPTION!!!"
>Once you have that, a bunch of math problems start to unravel.
Such as Fermat and "the missing dark matter"?
>Once applied to the Mandelbrot Set and video feeds or images, magical things happen.
Using the same rules of movement across the Mandelbrot Set and tracking it in 2/3/4/5D?
>Irrefutable Evidence Checking?
Proof
>Look back?
Recursion
>We have been lied to and lied to and lied to.
Those who don't learn the lessons of the past are doomed to repeat them until they do.
As far as I've seen, only Defango has said anything like that.
You haven't seen anything with a PGP signature saying that Q doesn't real.
I've also heard confirmed MI6 and confirmed NSA.
And confirmed "scouting".
And confirmed "white hats".
And confirmed ex-intel.
I'm not saying it can't be all of those at once, but.. Can you back your "confirmation" up?
You mean like when they subpoena'd Julian Assange?
Don't get ahead of yourself…
Discovery.
Then "why doooooon't we let the jury see for themselves?!"
But wait…
Jury of (((their))) peers…
So the jury would be biased…
And partisan…
The jury could say "We don't see a motive here, and the glove doesn't fit. We must acquit!"
Fuck it.
Military Tribunals, all the way.
Except for some bread and circuses for the normies.
Just for show.
Is Unirock even Cicada, though?
I've never come across that if it's a thing to have been come across.