>(Attack on Pepe?)
I didn't even think about that, Baker!
I gotta Meme that!.
Mattis Burns Woodward's Book
Mattis re: Bob Woodward book: "The contemptuous words about the President attributed to me in Woodward's book were never uttered by me or in my presence. While I generally enjoy reading fiction, this is a uniquely Washington brand of literature….."
Funny you bring that up. Check this out.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964),[1] was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that established the actual malice standard, which has to be met before press reports about public officials can be considered to be libel;[2] and hence allowed free reporting of the civil rights campaigns in the southern United States. It is one of the key decisions supporting the freedom of the press. The actual malice standard requires that the plaintiff in a defamation case, if that person is a public official or public figure, prove that the publisher of the statement in question knew that the statement was false or acted in reckless disregard of its truth or falsity. Because of the extremely high burden of proof on the plaintiff, and the difficulty of proving the defendant's knowledge and intentions, such claims by public figures rarely prevail
.
If Trump can amend this….
Baker Sauce for Mattis Burn
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bob-woodward-book-paints-portrait-chaotic-paranoid-white/story?id=57594550&cid=social_twitter_abcn
NOICE!
I thought that too when i read it.
POTUS Tweets on Woodawrds book.
1/2 CST
2/2
That's what we're here for.
Top-rated Roseanne Barr tells Wired Sources' @BerelIndig she's 'thinking about' returning to TV