>>3188964
>Does the ratio of tweets vs Qposts (in red around the outside of the funny graph) serve any other purpose?
The white numbers in the red ring around are the counts of posts at that marker which match the marker. For example, by now at the [:11] marker, there are a total of 37 Q posts with ":11" as minutes in their timestamp, and 38 Q posts with ":11" as seconds.
Tried to explain that in the center of the postMarkerStats graphic.
>>3196882
This is gonna be a little bit lengthy, trying my best for a potential new clockfag —
So, there are the markers (minutes or seconds in posts' timestamps and the days around the clock), and there are the deltas.
As I see it, the deltas typically indicate (or point out) important connections between posts, or tweets & posts (also, possibly, irrespective of their individual, exact timestamps)
There is a theory, that POTUS' tweets (maybe even on a daily basis) give the respective day's delta, which you'll have to take care of, for example when following Q posts or reading the news ("News unlocks the map.")
As for markers (the days around the Q clock, the minutes and/or seconds when a post was made) mostly you'd look through the posts that match that marker, and try to find connections between them. These connections will mostly be keywords, the same topic, or more abstract (i.e. more distant/"autistic") connections like colors, images or other things.
In the end, the main thing is to try to make them match/fit plausibly (and explain it), and to try to find a concise, more general system how to work with & connect the crumbs we've been given.
Overall of course is the useful "side-effect" to re-read crumbs and make Anons re-read crumbs, AND understand that many of these crumbs have been given to us quite long ago, and only now or in the future we'll be able to put them together/understand them to the full extent (i.e. "Future proves past.")