Anonymous ID: fb72e7 Sept. 24, 2018, 9:39 a.m. No.3166028   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7231

>>3163414

All good, thanks. Had been lurking mostly all weekend, following the many clocks that had been posted here & in the main bread.

Also noticed a small bug in the ThreeTimezone archive, which apparently had been fixed by now (three Q posts starting at /PF/ 266, I believe, were missing).

There's not much more to test on the QClockView (except maybe bugs in general behaviour which users might come across when using it often) – will add some more smaller functions these days (images, abbreviations etc).

Anonymous ID: fb72e7 Sept. 24, 2018, 1:40 p.m. No.3169006   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5219

>>3168612

The easiest way is probably to double-click on a single day that is at the marker you want all posts listed for (e.g. [:30]).

Then click the Button "Timestamp → Clock", which should make the QCalendarTime jump back to that day.

Now go into the MainMenu at "Markings" and select "Single Marker only", which should highlight the entire [:30] ray (i.e. the minute hand of the shown QCalendarTime).

Typically then the list would show all (32) posts at that marker ([:30]).

You can then use the lower-left ChangeListButton to toggle b/w lists available. One of them would give you posts for "All Days Marked".

Glad to hear it works & is useful. Thanks!

Anonymous ID: fb72e7 Sept. 25, 2018, 5:41 p.m. No.3185578   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3185310

Links always the same, and is in the Resources Section above (dough):

mega.nz/#F!yX430T5L!BZYfnSxftcSqewvZuknnCQ

 

Just checked it and it's all good.

In that version, however, there was a small bug in the ThreeTimeZone HTML, so you'd better also get the HTMLonly version of the archive – saves you the update, but you can try it out with an old archive (incl. in QClockView-zip for testing purposes) or wait until Q posts again.

Link for the latest 3Timezone archive:

mega.nz/#F!iLwgXKRb!XvA-cUt5-8XyRPlgoVH-FQ

(HTML-only is enough if you have all Q images saved somewhere)

Anonymous ID: fb72e7 Sept. 26, 2018, 8:14 a.m. No.3192353   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2609 >>4449 >>1176 >>4566

>>3190334

Liked his speech – except the part when he (more or less clearly) associated Iran with ISIS (i.e. the terrorists in Syria).

Every Anon worth their salt (and the whole World for that matter) knows that it was not Iran who financed/facilitated ISIS/AlQaeda/etc.

Would have wished he'd take more responsibility on that part, as it was not to a small extent C_A/MOS/Arab (i.e. sunni that is) interests that created & helped these motherfuckers to become what they were in the end.

No warfagging is the premise (and promise) – that goes for "reigning in" Israel (or any other proxies) just the same.

 

>>3188453

Another JFK coincidence, which I was unaware of, and had been posted in a previous bread (#4040) on mainstreet (pic relates).

Anonymous ID: fb72e7 Sept. 26, 2018, 2:54 p.m. No.3197386   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4566

>>3188964

>Does the ratio of tweets vs Qposts (in red around the outside of the funny graph) serve any other purpose?

The white numbers in the red ring around are the counts of posts at that marker which match the marker. For example, by now at the [:11] marker, there are a total of 37 Q posts with ":11" as minutes in their timestamp, and 38 Q posts with ":11" as seconds.

Tried to explain that in the center of the postMarkerStats graphic.

 

>>3196882

This is gonna be a little bit lengthy, trying my best for a potential new clockfag —

So, there are the markers (minutes or seconds in posts' timestamps and the days around the clock), and there are the deltas.

 

As I see it, the deltas typically indicate (or point out) important connections between posts, or tweets & posts (also, possibly, irrespective of their individual, exact timestamps)

 

There is a theory, that POTUS' tweets (maybe even on a daily basis) give the respective day's delta, which you'll have to take care of, for example when following Q posts or reading the news ("News unlocks the map.")

 

As for markers (the days around the Q clock, the minutes and/or seconds when a post was made) mostly you'd look through the posts that match that marker, and try to find connections between them. These connections will mostly be keywords, the same topic, or more abstract (i.e. more distant/"autistic") connections like colors, images or other things.

In the end, the main thing is to try to make them match/fit plausibly (and explain it), and to try to find a concise, more general system how to work with & connect the crumbs we've been given.

 

Overall of course is the useful "side-effect" to re-read crumbs and make Anons re-read crumbs, AND understand that many of these crumbs have been given to us quite long ago, and only now or in the future we'll be able to put them together/understand them to the full extent (i.e. "Future proves past.")

Anonymous ID: fb72e7 Sept. 26, 2018, 4:16 p.m. No.3198566   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3197614

Good find with the AG Speed connection! Like it too! Thanks.

As for that one single post (21:11:55) which shows up w/o having "speed" – think it is be an error in indexing/retrieving results (as the page likely does not search ALL posts in realtime, but by some pre-defined index).

 

Post 107 on /PF/ has "GODSPEED ONE AND ALL.", Post 107 on /GA/ is the one erroneously shown (21:11:55) – so I think that's the reason.

The inverse: Search for "Godspeed" and that No. 107 from /PF/ is missing (i.e. 25 results instead of 26 from QClockView)