repost for visibility

true pundit article re: Flynn and Mueller has no sauce, and is just anonymous DOJ 'insiders" for TP's article. We've seen this many times with TP, and their 'sources' typically are wrong. For consideration of those anons who read the head line and got happy.

It's just made up similar to CNN/MSNBC ect.

I'd like to believe it is correct info, but we are here to research, not exploit confirmation bias.

>>2879412

really? all I did was read the article…. did you?

I judge by the fruits. And this article is rotten fruit. fuck off shill

>>2879464

>https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91584&page=1

anon this is a whistle blower re: reorganization of FBI, not a whistle blower re: Flynn being wrongly targeted. Different subjects

>>2879464

But that being said, I think this is a decent find. As long as TP is getting notables, this should get a notable as well.

>>2879464 FBI Whistle Blower Claiming FBI needs Restructuring

>>2879620

You are correct anon, its not a stretch at all, but thats the beauty of confirmation bias, find something they want to believe to be true and plausible, and push it with anonymous "insiders".

I've noticed an uptick in freaking out over headlines on Q research, and less actual reading/researching of articles. Just trying to vet a bit here.

o7

>>2879673

yes I mentioned it, but anons are just reading headlines it seems….

>>2879692

yes duffle blog is not a real source, it's speculation at best, fiction at worst.

>>2879725

not ya fault Baker, anons are pushing headlines w/o reading today. Cant expect Baker to be able to read through everything

>>2879738

so they engage in satire, AND real news is what you're saying? And they dont distinguish between the two?

or none of it is satire?

cmon anon…

>>2879763

ah, sorry misread your post then anon. thought you meant it was indeed a real source, kek

>>2879914

what in the FUCK. i already cant wear my fuckign nikes anymore fuck them anyways, but shit now fucking jeans is political now???

RIP Levi's