you may not think so, but Mueller allowing just written statements is yuge
this means POTUS essentially can't be charged with a perjury nonsense (assuming Rudy and Jay have their shit straight)
also means the 'witch hunt' part of the show will come to an end sooner
trips confirm brrrrrrrrt chekkin' in
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/earth-is-flat-as-a-pita-the-israelis-who-push-the-ultimate-conspiracy-theory-1.5448036
I saw this earlier
kek usually don't post astronews… unless its about the space force of course!
so did (((pussibiec))) drop the chat logs yet?
not giving that subversive faggot any v(you)s
no need to worry, got them all anon
its subtle
bosons are no 'particles' anon
think about an electron vs a photon
while a photon may act like a particle (Wave–particle duality) it is not a particle in the sense an electron or a quark is
Bosons are force CARRIERS
tried to find a good link for you, this seems ok:
https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/july-2013/force-carriers
but I use this site a lot, a bit outdated imo, but useful as fuck for me:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Particles/expar.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mod1.html#c1
agreed, off topic AS FUCK, but was answering that anon
kek
I really need to do moar digging on that
it wasn't really covered much in my classes
On 8 October 2013 the Nobel prize in physics was awarded jointly to François Englert and Peter Higgs "for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN's Large Hadron Collider."
https://home.cern/about/physics/standard-model
>inb4 muh cern
its a good explanation, whatever
so yea basically, but NOT related to EM
its own boson/force carrier (essentially gravity/mass, like EM/charge)
no, its not a field, but bosons CARRY or propagate the energy of a field
example:
a charge generates a field, but a boson would carry the field's energy
the photon is the boson
no
tensors:
Tensors, defined mathematically, are simply arrays of numbers, or functions, that transform according to certain rules under a change of coordinates. In physics, tensors characterize the properties of a physical system, as is best illustrated by giving some examples (below).
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae168.cfm
bosons/'force carriers':
Forces and carrier particles
There are four fundamental forces at work in the universe: the strong force, the weak force, the electromagnetic force, and the gravitational force. They work over different ranges and have different strengths. Gravity is the weakest but it has an infinite range. The electromagnetic force also has infinite range but it is many times stronger than gravity. The weak and strong forces are effective only over a very short range and dominate only at the level of subatomic particles. Despite its name, the weak force is much stronger than gravity but it is indeed the weakest of the other three. The strong force, as the name suggests, is the strongest of all four fundamental interactions.
Three of the fundamental forces result from the exchange of force-carrier particles, which belong to a broader group called “bosons”. Particles of matter transfer discrete amounts of energy by exchanging bosons with each other. Each fundamental force has its own corresponding boson – the strong force is carried by the “gluon”, the electromagnetic force is carried by the “photon”, and the “W and Z bosons” are responsible for the weak force. Although not yet found, the “graviton” should be the corresponding force-carrying particle of gravity. The Standard Model includes the electromagnetic, strong and weak forces and all their carrier particles, and explains well how these forces act on all of the matter particles. However, the most familiar force in our everyday lives, gravity, is not part of the Standard Model, as fitting gravity comfortably into this framework has proved to be a difficult challenge. The quantum theory used to describe the micro world, and the general theory of relativity used to describe the macro world, are difficult to fit into a single framework. No one has managed to make the two mathematically compatible in the context of the Standard Model. But luckily for particle physics, when it comes to the minuscule scale of particles, the effect of gravity is so weak as to be negligible. Only when matter is in bulk, at the scale of the human body or of the planets for example, does the effect of gravity dominate. So the Standard Model still works well despite its reluctant exclusion of one of the fundamental forces.
https://home.cern/about/physics/standard-model
gonna stop now though, this isn't a physics chatroom, those exist
sounds correct, would need to dig a bit to be 100% on that