Anonymous ID: e79491 Sept. 5, 2018, midnight No.2884338   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2884055

>the one RR signed, but is not the affiant or something, per a lawfag, so he is not criminally liable

 

Not criminally liable? That lawyer was wrong. RR may be criminally liable in a CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY. It would require proving intent to enter into and furtherance of the criminal conspiracy, but I bet there's more than enough evidence to prove that element.