>>2885646 (pb)
Has the video at the above link been critically addressed or discussed in a past bread? If so, I haven't been able to find any substantive discourse and would appreciate a link.
>>2885646 (pb)
Has the video at the above link been critically addressed or discussed in a past bread? If so, I haven't been able to find any substantive discourse and would appreciate a link.
>>2886349 (pb)
I agree it'll need to be answered. After much personal thought on this, I'm still caught in a dilemma about how to proceed should DJT come out and–for whatever reason–disavow knowledge of Q.
In my eyes, the Achilles Heel of the QAnon movement has always been that annoying statement that disinformation is necessary. I understand and agree with that statement within the larger effort but vehemently disagree with disinformation being allowed between Q and QAnons. Again, that's the weakness. At any time we have a suspicion that Q has been compromised, the fact that we permit disinformation between us and Q pretty much kills our argument to require proof there isn't any there there.
If that simple vulnerability weren't there, the video in the top link above would be easy to overlook. Going forward, I cannot see how we proceed with Q unless he commits to no more disinformation between us and him. Otherwise, I'd just prefer to ignore him and continue with MAGA.
Simply out, WWG1WGA (unless, of course, we had to be used for disinformation purposes). Not something I agree with–WWG1WUGA. [U]sually.
Let's consider talking about this. Soon.
BAKER NEEDS HANDOFF
Come one guys! Anybody? He's been baking 7+ hours. Help a brotha out.
Baker, I clearly have to learn to bake. This is unconscionable. Sorry I can't help right now…
If we go to eBake, so be it.
TY Baker
I think I'm going to hold off learning to bake until I can reconcile disinformation is necessary between us and Q. Sure, it's a given disinformation is a tool of war, but between allies? No. I'm lost there.
BAKER, HOW YOU HOLDIN' UP?
Sorry, I'm not. I just wish I was–well, I did wish I was until I tried to "reconcile" the disinformation requirement.
If we have to eBake, then so be it.
BAKER'S DYIN' OVER HERE–HANDOFF NEEDED
Not me, just concernfagging about it.
Great points, all. I am thinking much clearer about it now. Thanks guys.
Will do. Thanks.
Ooooo…. good point. That was a big fucking disaster.
He does sound level-headed, though. But nevertheless, I'm beginning to see why Q even has to disinfo us.