Anonymous ID: b5b9a7 Sept. 5, 2018, 9:49 a.m. No.2887962   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8171 >>8524

>>2887952

>>2886349 (pb)

I agree it'll need to be answered. After much personal thought on this, I'm still caught in a dilemma about how to proceed should DJT come out and–for whatever reason–disavow knowledge of Q.

 

In my eyes, the Achilles Heel of the QAnon movement has always been that annoying statement that disinformation is necessary. I understand and agree with that statement within the larger effort but vehemently disagree with disinformation being allowed between Q and QAnons. Again, that's the weakness. At any time we have a suspicion that Q has been compromised, the fact that we permit disinformation between us and Q pretty much kills our argument to require proof there isn't any there there.

 

If that simple vulnerability weren't there, the video in the top link above would be easy to overlook. Going forward, I cannot see how we proceed with Q unless he commits to no more disinformation between us and him. Otherwise, I'd just prefer to ignore him and continue with MAGA.

 

Simply out, WWG1WGA (unless, of course, we had to be used for disinformation purposes). Not something I agree with–WWG1WUGA. [U]sually.

 

Let's consider talking about this. Soon.

Anonymous ID: b5b9a7 Sept. 5, 2018, 10:04 a.m. No.2888177   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8212

BAKER NEEDS HANDOFF

Come one guys! Anybody? He's been baking 7+ hours. Help a brotha out.

 

Baker, I clearly have to learn to bake. This is unconscionable. Sorry I can't help right now…

 

If we go to eBake, so be it.