Anonymous ID: 87f784 Sept. 5, 2018, 10:53 a.m. No.2888847   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8868 >>8873 >>8935 >>8939 >>8958 >>9005 >>9049 >>9085

>>2887813 (Q post)

>Ask yourself a (simple) logical questionโ€ฆ

>Why are the majority of 'Q' attacks by "PRO_MAGA" supporters coming from AJ [MOS backed] and/or AJ known associates?

 

Labeling online Trump backers "Mossad" on the chans?

Mossad, known to American voters only as the Israeli/Jewish spy agency?

Those Trump backers with millions of Trump followers/voters?

Millions of followers/voters leading up to the mid term election?

Millions of Trump voters, including Christian evangelicals who love Israel?

An election that could lead to the dems win and Trump impeachment if Trump's base is divided and doesn't show at the polls?

Use anti-Semitism to divide Trump's base 2 months from the mid terms?

 

"Muh jooos" division tactic from Q?

Really?

 

Simple question:

Trump's own daughter and grand children are Jewish.

Is this division of his base a plan that Trump would sign on to?

 

Another simple question:

Would a Trump ally or a Trump enemy try to divide his base 2 months before the mid term elections?

Elections that could lead to dems winning and impeaching Trump?

 

Anons: Take a step back and try to see what this board is being used for โ€ฆ and by whom it is being used.

Anonymous ID: 87f784 Sept. 5, 2018, 10:57 a.m. No.2888932   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8990 >>9070

>>2888873

 

To you and most other chan posters, this is well known.

BUT: To the average American Trump voter who spends no time on the chans, there is no difference and there is no time to explain it to them.

Someone like Q would know this.

I stand by my assessment of this Q and this "operation".

Anonymous ID: 87f784 Sept. 5, 2018, 11 a.m. No.2888975   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2888739

>Q is larping

>takes down all media on the right

>all media on left is running around free

 

Should be glaringly obvious by now.

All Trump backers discredited, even by Q, leading up to the mid terms?

"Use logic" indeed.