>>2888662 (pb)

About the forensic evidence in photos:

"Blow-up," a movie from 1966; A scene in the beginning stuck with me. A photog is taking images in the Park; Something distracts him. When he gets home and looks at a photo he took there, he discovers a dead body in background, near a bench

[This might tie into the previous Notable "Autists are the natural enemy of Psychopaths >>2883263 ]

Alright, for people who demand sauce. Where's the sauce here? Is it in the photo? The testimony of the Photog?

If you are an actual journalist you can't always be citing other journalists.

That's actually what frauds like Woodward and "I-could-name-a -whole-list" do:

They have a circle jerk of citations

"the buck has to stop" somewhere?

It's not like the joke about "Flat Earth"

"What's Underneath?"

It's a Trutle

"What's under that?"

You can stop right there, it's turtles all the way down.

Somebody somewhere has to put together the actual material.

I'm thinking journalism schools are set - up to train or "school" people that "no one will believe you " without two sources.

The implication of which is "We don't believe you!"

They are trained this way to be part of the system.

Everybody points to somebody else and not allowed to be their own source?

All the sources are lying or fake but a long as they support and cover for each other the criminal conspiracy appears to be grounded in reality?

It turns out to be, through analysis of the system, the same "boot-strap" impossibility [pulling themselves off the ground with their own boot straps] that they pretend to be so afraid of while demanding "sources. "

Mass Media never proves what they tell you.

But our work is never believed because even if you have the proof, they will refuse to see it and claim you need to work harder for "physical evidence" [even when logic has already proved your point], or the ever elusive "Smoking Gun."

"Smoking Gun" must be the biggest joke to these people, right up there with "kerosine disintegrated the Towers, hit by planes" and "the magic bullet killed JFK" or yes "The deluded gunman" which broke up H.W. Bush at the funeral of Ford:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft3eGWZd7LE

Bush Sr. Laughs at JFK Shooting

A lot of real evidence can be discovered by blowing up photos, slowing down vids and using your own eyes as a "source"

Look at a recent review of the 1966 movie, "Blow - Up" which mentioned" Blue Pill. " Coincidentally enough

Apparently no body payed any mind to the murder he discovered by his own photo in the Park, so he gave-up and "joined the crowd" in ignorance. He took the Blue pill.

"The Disturbing Relevance of “Blow-Up”

http://moviemezzanine.com/blow-up-essay/

"While Thomas’ encounter with death awakens him from existential slumber and forces him to perceive reality for the first time, he realizes just as quickly that this knowledge is pointless if no one else shares it. Thomas knows that people believe in an illusion in the same way that the mimes believe they are playing tennis. But in the film’s closing moments, when Thomas decides to perceive the ball, he finally understands that he has no choice but to drink the Koo-Aid, take the blue pill and return to that illusion in order to survive. His literal fading away at the end of the film captures the intensely sad moment of his surrender.

Blow-Up is one of Antonioni’s most accessible films, but also one of his most ferocious. Its utterly hopeless cry at post-war indifference is all the more powerful because the film takes the time to establish and “normalize” the postmodern society of the 1960s. The sudden, unexpected and overwhelming surge of emotion felt halfway through is perhaps even more gut-wrenching today at a time in which our society has become even more impersonal, our indifference all the more banal. Here’s hoping that in 2017, unlike Thomas, we won’t have to stand alone."