yes, but a recurring pattern, not so surprising in how it is expressed.
there is a certain specific kind of personal-militant-crazy that seems to always seems to have the same style
yes, but a recurring pattern, not so surprising in how it is expressed.
there is a certain specific kind of personal-militant-crazy that seems to always seems to have the same style
>never honest, open, straight-forward
KEK
ok you get a yu for the funny projection.
this point is easily answered by even a child smart enough to get through the crumbs
>how does controlled ops work?
>Are there even humans here? I can't tell.
see how many and how loud anons who tell you what it isn't
>>2889764 ok i'll play nice.
we learned comms.
we can read.
we can think.
the rest follows.
Q, even when ambiguous, is very clear for autists/anons.
a lot don't get it and can't get it even when chewed for them, though
hey, it's all right there.
open for all to see.
not all can understand (yet).
where to begin:
https://qanon.pub/
the drops alone can get confusing at first.
the spreadsheet is a great help/tool:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M2AzhZKh2PjL7L7GVPN42Em0hZXKWMdhGnj59ZQ3YcQ/
there are many archive links in the bread (those repeated top posts that bakers provide), so you might find some you prefer.
welcome, and dig in.
welp, horsie, you found the water.
i can't shove it down your throat.
learn to ctrl-f.
good luck!
where to begin:
https://qanon.pub/
the drops alone can get confusing at first.
the spreadsheet is a great help/tool:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1M2AzhZKh2PjL7L7GVPN42Em0hZXKWMdhGnj59ZQ3YcQ/
there are many archive links in the bread (those repeated top posts that bakers provide), so you might find some you prefer.
welcome, and dig in.
welp, being outed as a confirmed liar is a problem if posing as "truther journalism"โฆ
Loomer is obvious controlled op. just wait, she'll burn herself very soon.
how bout dis one: MOSSAD.
whew
that was simple, eh?
now just add months of research, understanding of context, and you're well on your way
>Anything you consider obvious is certainly not so to me.
aaw, so sad.
your gingers are
>the weakest of arguments that
you use, tho.
sad how you divide yourself from us anons.
the rest is ok (hence the sadness)
>Sad. You don't even realize whom I'm actually referring to. All you can do is attack.
i wish you would have better reading comprehension, too.
still sad, almost-frenโฆ
<not quite there yet but getting closer