Anonymous ID: b7186a Sept. 5, 2018, 2:26 p.m. No.2891930   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2042

>>2891069 (pb)

This is simply high-larious. If you wanted to write a parody of cuckservative concern-fagging, this would be it. A robot could have written this, and who knows? maybe did. They are not sending their best.

Anonymous ID: b7186a Sept. 5, 2018, 3:05 p.m. No.2892448   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2509

>>2892406

It wasn't even a line of questioning, more a speech with a couple of "don't you agree" thrown in. Kav was looking like, "Is there a question in there for me?" Kav's job seemed to be providing the accurate case references off the top of his head (because he has all of US case law memorized and ready to quote without thinking about it).