In light of Posobiec, failed predictions, ect, Q could prove legitimacy with plausible deniability very simply. Just do something. Arrest someone. Disclose something. Something that shows the Q world view isn’t just fantasy bullshit. Why nothing? “Total control.” Total control while Trump has traitors in the inner circle publishing articles in the NYT, while Lindsey Graham is allowed to spout at Kavanaugh, while we watch that McCain funeral farce, and on and on.
Moreover, we have Q spouting off at Alex Jones again. Alex who was the first guy with any following whatsoever who brought awareness to globalism and the deep state. Those are his terms, and he’s been hammering them on air while everyone laughed at him since he was 20 years old. Dont care what any of you say, Alex had millions of followers and along with roger stone and their other associates, played a big part in getting Trump elected. Big tech under direction of deep state has now taken him off of all major platforms, and yet he is supposed to be working with the enemy? “Use logic.”
Name calling. All it is. Your position doesn’t make sense.
More plausible than he was on the other side from the beginning, but if they got to him and he is controlled, why did they ban him then?
What I bring is a skeptical mind to a board populated with far too many who operate on blind faith and hope. I could be wrong, but there are plenty of logical reasons to doubt Q’s legitimacy. If he is real, the truth will vindicate you and nothing anything I say will change that. If Q is a psyop and is misleading the base, it could have very negative consequences for the movement.
Another brilliant rebuttal. Use emotion, use personal attacks. Logic is too much for small minds to bear.