Anonymous ID: 54d4a4 Sept. 5, 2018, 7:48 p.m. No.2897192   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7469 >>7754 >>7851

FBI Still Investigating –Another Superseding Indictment Likely in November-December

 

https://frankreport.com/2018/09/05/fbi-still-investigating-another-superseding-indictment-likely-in-november-december/

Anonymous ID: 54d4a4 Sept. 5, 2018, 7:49 p.m. No.2897212   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7754 >>7851

UN Says the Obvious: Al-Qaeda Able to Produce Chlorine Gas in Syria

 

Al-Qaeda affiliated Al-Nusra terrorists have the resources and ability to produce chlorine gas to use against the population, UN special envoy to Syria Staffan de Mistura told a news conference on Tuesday.

 

“I have said and confirm my view that both the government and the [al-Nusra] Front – which is an organization declared as terrorist by the Security Council – have the ability to produce chlorine for armed use,” Staffan de Mistura told reporters.

 

The envoy stressed that chlorine has a “horrible and unique feature of being in the gray zone between what is considered a chemical attack or not.”

 

The Russian Defense Ministry has recently warned that the leader of the terrorist group Tahrir al-Sham, which is affiliated with the al-Nusra Front, is planning a chemical attack on civilians in Syria’s Idlib province, in order to provoke retaliation against Damascus.

 

Last week, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov said that terrorists carried eight cans of chlorine gas to a village southwest of Idlib. According to Konashenkov, a chemical attack would create a pretext for Western intervention in the case of an Idlib operation.

The Syrian government has already accused terrorists of using chemical weapons on other occasions. On the other hand, Damascus eliminated all its chemical arsenals in 2013 and no longer resorted to chemical weapons.

 

The question of chemical weapons is once again being raised as the Syrian Army makes final preparations to launch an operation to clear jihadist-held Idlib province of terrorist organizations.

 

All the elite units of the Syrian Army, including the Tiger Forces, the 4th Mechanized Units and the Republican Guards will participate in this operation. The defeat of terrorism in Idlib will mean that only small pockets of ISIS in eastern Syria and Kurdish-held regions in eastern and northern Syria will need to be dealt with so that Syria once again becomes a united and sovereign state.

 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/un-says-the-obvious-al-qaeda-able-to-produce-chlorine-gas-in-syria/5653091

Anonymous ID: 54d4a4 Sept. 5, 2018, 7:54 p.m. No.2897282   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7754 >>7851

The Invasion of Afghanistan, October 7, 2001: Did 9/11 Justify the War in Afghanistan?

 

There are many questions to ask about the war in Afghanistan. One that has been widely asked is whether it will turn out to be “Obama’s Vietnam.”1 This question implies another: Is this war winnable, or is it destined to be a quagmire, like Vietnam? These questions are motivated in part by the widespread agreement that the Afghan government, under Hamid Karzai, is at least as corrupt and incompetent as the government the United States tried to prop up in South Vietnam for 20 years.

 

Although there are many similarities between these two wars, there is also a big difference: This time, there is no draft. If there were a draft, so that college students and their friends back home were being sent to Afghanistan, there would be huge demonstrations against this war on campuses all across this country. If the sons and daughters of wealthy and middle-class parents were coming home in boxes, or with permanent injuries or post-traumatic stress syndrome, this war would have surely been stopped long ago. People have often asked: Did we learn any of the “lessons of Vietnam”? The US government learned one: If you’re going to fight unpopular wars, don’t have a draft – hire mercenaries!

 

There are many other questions that have been, and should be, asked about this war, but in this essay, I focus on only one: Did the 9/11 attacks justify the war in Afghanistan?

 

This question has thus far been considered off-limits, not to be raised in polite company, and certainly not in the mainstream media. It has been permissible, to be sure, to ask whether the war during the past several years has been justified by those attacks so many years ago. But one has not been allowed to ask whether the original invasion was justified by the 9/11 attacks.

 

However, what can be designated the “McChrystal Moment” – the probably brief period during which the media are again focused on the war in Afghanistan in the wake of the Rolling Stone story about General Stanley McChrystal, the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, which led to his resignation – provides the best opportunity for some time to raise fundamental questions about this war. Various commentators have already been asking some pretty basic questions: about the effectiveness and affordability of the present “counterinsurgency strategy” and even whether American fighting forces should remain in Afghanistan at all. But I am interested in an even more fundamental question: Whether this war was ever really justified by the publicly given reason: the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

 

This question has two parts: First, did these attacks provide a legal justification for the invasion of Afghanistan? Second, if not, did they at least provide a moral justification?

 

MUCH MUCH MORE:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/did-9-11-justify-the-war-in-afghanistan/19891

Anonymous ID: 54d4a4 Sept. 5, 2018, 8:01 p.m. No.2897365   🗄️.is 🔗kun

South Korean Envoy Reveals When Third Inter-Korean Summit to Be Held

 

MOSCOW (Sputnik) - The third inter-Korean summit will be held on September 18-20 September in North Korea, the special envoy of the South Korean president Moon Jae-in said Thursday.

 

Earlier, media reported that the envoy from Seoul met in Pyongyang with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and handed him the message from president Moon.

 

"First, the South and the North agreed to hold a South-North Korean summit in Pyongyang between Sept. 18-20, and to hold high-level negotiations early next week to prepare for the summit," Chung Eui-yong said, as quoted by the Yonhap news agency.

 

Moon and Kim held two bilateral meetings earlier this year, in April and in May.

 

Previous month, officials from the North and South Korea began their talks on preparations for the planned high-level bilateral summit on the northern side of the truce village of Panmunjom, media reported.

 

Moon Jae-in and Kim Jong-un held two bilateral meetings earlier this year amid burgeoning diplomacy on the Korean Peninsula.

 

During their historic summit in Panmunjom in late April, the South Korean President promised to visit Pyongyang for a meeting in fall.

 

https://sputniknews.com/asia/201809061067789924-south-korea-reveals-inter-korean-summit/

Anonymous ID: 54d4a4 Sept. 5, 2018, 8:10 p.m. No.2897492   🗄️.is 🔗kun

How People Become Easily Controlled By Tyrants

 

The question often arises in liberty movement circles as to how we get to the point of full blown tyranny within a society. There are numerous factors that determine this outcome, but through all the various totalitarian systems in history there are common denominators – elements that must be there for tyrants to prevail. When we can identify these common elements in an objective manner, we make it far more difficult for despotic structures to stand.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-05/how-people-become-easily-controlled-tyrants

Anonymous ID: 54d4a4 Sept. 5, 2018, 8:12 p.m. No.2897521   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7754 >>7851

Nike Becomes Face of Social Justice Despite History of Outsourcing, Employing Slave Labor

 

Despite having a long, documented history of allegedly employing workers at slave wages, the multinational Nike corporation has become the face of the social justice wing of the political left with its newest ad featuring former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick.

 

As Breitbart News reported, the Nike corporation laid off 1,400 Americans just last year in the state of Oregon, cutting out workers who were older and likely sending their jobs overseas as the sports brand has done in the past.

 

In 2015, a screen printing factory in Clarence, New York used by Nike to make T-shirts that once employed nearly 170 Americans announced it was closing up shop and sending the jobs to low wage Honduras. The average minimum wage worker in Honduras earns less than $8,000 a year.

 

Nike’s history of alleged employment of slave labor in countries like Vietnam, China, Indonesia, and Honduras dates back so far that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) blasted the corporation’s business practices in 1997, as Breitbart News noted:

 

Now, Nike has a habit of going to wherever in the world, wages are at rock bottom. Mexico is much too high wage for Nike. They’re now in Vietnam. They have determined that wages in Vietnam are the lowest in the world. [Emphasis added]

 

Let me quote this, ‘In demonstrations on Friday, workers burned cars and ransacked the factory’s office, saying the company, Nike, wasn’t paying them a $2.50 a day minimum wage.’ That’s our competition. That is what much of what the global economy is about. American workers, you really want to compete? You really want to go below $2.50 an hour? Nike might come back to America and hire you if you’re ready to go for $2 a day. You ready to do that? [Emphasis added]

 

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/05/nike-becomes-face-of-social-justice-despite-history-of-outsourcing-employing-slave-labor/