>>2896544 (PB)

I know no such thing. You built a house on speculation. I could start with the same speculation, use the same facts and come to the conclusion that the tech and media heads aren't "acting" at all but actually intend to win.

This is a battle to the death … for many people that has a literal application. The people who build and manage the corporations you refer to are not the sort of people who fold their cards when they think they might have a winning hand or that you might play your winning hand badly.

This is the card game of Bridge, where it is perfectly easy to have a winning hand, mislay a card and lose anyway. Like Q has said, the order things happen in is important.

>>2897435

I'm well aware that Bill Cooper ("Behold A Pale Horse") identified conservative patriots as primary targets. I'm also skeptical enough not to trust you.

There aren't as many Pollyannas here as you might imagine.