Anonymous ID: 9850c3 Sept. 5, 2018, 10:03 p.m. No.2898904   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8922 >>8940

Laura Ingraham and Hannity both love their voices so much that they do not let a guest speak more than 20 seconds before interrupting.

 

I get that are excited and have short time blocks, but seriously it is hard to follow a point of view with all the interjections.

 

Let the guests look good for once. It is not all about you looking good all the time.

Anonymous ID: 9850c3 Sept. 5, 2018, 10:28 p.m. No.2899122   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9151

>>2899064

>Serious question from someone that did not see the episode.

 

>Normally guests are scheduled for a particular reason… they have a book or movie to shill etc.

 

>What was the pretext for Kerry to be on Colbert?

 

>Is it something that was a little too convenient timing, or was there a legitimate reason he was scheduled to be on?

 

The timing is suspect.

1) The article was release only 1 hour before Cobert taped. Did he have advance info from the NYT?

2) Kerry was there to just talk. Conveniently, he was asked about running for president. Of course he gave the usual weasel politician answer of not having ruled out the possibility.

 

"Less than an hour before The Late Show’s Wednesday night taping began, The New York Times published its op-ed from an anonymous senior official who self-identified as “part of the resistance inside the Trump administration.” "