Maybe you can help explain why the first ever paper on the "adrenochrome theory of psychosis" was presented to the Royal Scottish Rites of New York ?
http://sci-hub.tw/https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.98.411.309
You could renounce your membership.
You could pledge allegiance to the flag, and to the republic for which it stands, and against ANYONE found involved in hurting our children. That's what you COULD do.
The original paper I linked. Not the blatant "lets attack the theory while salvaging the PC tech" hitpiece. That was to show it went to 33.
And this followup. LOOK AT WHAT THEY CLAIM TO HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DO IN A YEAR. No fucking way! They knew this from their sacrifices.
Being "in" one of these sick groups gave you:
Power
Jollies
Ascension
Asset development
UNLIMITED ACCESS to otherwise unavailable research subjects.
If I had scientific knowledge, but couldn't divulge where I got it from, What would I have to do if I wanted it published?
I would have to make up a reason for it; I'd theorize and connect dots from previous work.
I'd have to cover the science of it as best as possible without drawing too much attention to the real nature of my discovery.
Once I published that, I would have to publish the proof to the theory "after strenuous testing (and a bit of luck)" but it would have to be fairly quickly to avoid another disgusting "in" scientist for snaking my work and taking the credit.
I'd probably have to reach a bit in the 2nd paper, so I might bring in a friend who has supporting work.
This would all require extra cash, so I'll go to my sick bosses, and in return they're going to want a say in my narrative; Maybe a few statements painting their enemies in a negative light to add "scientific weight" to their notions of the world.
If I was working for a Tavistock manipulated group or institution, I'd mention one of the players as contributing to the cause… a shout out- 1950's SRA style.
Now look at this 2nd paper, and then go wiki schizophrenia, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Autism, and Epilepsy and see if you don't recognize a pattern of obfuscation.
https://sci-hub.tw/10.1192/bjp.100.418.29
the Mills Study is the hit piece that was dumb enough to mention it (reference 18)
Why is a site last edited in 2014 using an 80 year old term for schizophrenia?
(last paragraph)
http://www.themasonictrowel.com/masonic_talk/stb/stbs/37-05.htm
Don't fall for the "it's a young adulthood" or "that's just one paper BS either. TONS of papers. Focus mentions childhood.
from the footnote of paper 2: HUXLEY (Tavistock)
-
Since this paper was written Mr. Aldous Huxley has given us an account of the preparation of amanila paniherina which may explain why it has not commended itself to western experimenters. The active principle is excreted in the urine of those who have ingested it. The hospitable Siberian chews the fungus himself and then offers his most favoured guest a brimming bumper of his urine. The hallucinogenic substance remains potent after four to five passages through the human body so that when one has enjoyed it one passes it on to someone else. Amongst the Siberians, less honoured guests receive the hallucinogen after it has been used by several others. It only remains now to carry out this experiment with schizophrenic urine.
Just my opinion: It goes back further. Bleuler coined schizophrenia and Autism around the same time if not in the same paper. He seems to be connected as well. There was a lot of work on the anatomy, physiology, neurobiochemistry, etc. of STRESS. I'd look closely at the authors for ties and go forward from there. It may well be that our understanding of the obviously controversial topics Autism, Epilepsy, Schizophrenia, and Dissociative Identity Disorder are seriously tainted to serve their purposes (deflection, projection, eugenics justification, programming)
This really stings. How many peoples lives were destroyed by bullshit diagnoses, unneeded meds and deflection of blame?
What about the projection???
Fake: Dissociative Identity Disorder -
is that even real?
false memories by certain doctors who use hypnosis
MUCH THERAPY NEEDED OR SYMPTOMS WILL COME BACK
false memories in court means escape justice
Real:
Schizophrenia fake:
not split mind
life long illness requiring lifelong meds
GENETIC
Real:
Truth may well be a very blurred line separating the two, but how the fuck are we supposed to find this out if we can't count on the institutions to maintain the integrity of our scientific literature?
Too busy murdering our kids. ANGER
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ET0LYLAuxjc&t=25s
more sauce.
"EXCRETION OF EPINEPHRINE AND NOREPINEPHRINE IN VARIOUS EMOTIONAL STATES*
FRED ELMADJIAN, PH.D., JUSTIN M. HOPE, M.D. AND EDWIN T. LAMSON, B.A. The Worcester Foundation for Experimental Biology,[] Massachusetts, and the Dementia Praecox Research Project, Worcester State Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts
RESPONSES of the adrenal gland to stress have been the subject of much research (1). Unlike the adrenal cortex, the adrenal medulla as a part of the sympathetic nervous system is intimately connected with the expression of the emotions (2). A study was undertaken to determine the excretion of epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) of normal and psychiatric patients in various emotional states. "
"Schizophrenia in Childhood. By Charles Bradley, M.D., Medical Director, Emma Pendleton Bradley Home, East Providence, Rhode Island. Cloth. Price, $2.50. Pp. 152. New York: Macmillan Company, 1941.
This small volume has been made possible by the beneficence of the Supreme Council, Thirty-Third Degree Scottish Rite Masons of the Northern Jurisdiction, and it is one of many researches on dementia praecox which they have sponsored."
"Dementia Praecox. The Past Decade's Work and Present Status: A Review and Evaluation. By Leopold Bellak. Price, $10. Pp. 456. Grune & Stratton, Inc., 381 4th Ave., New York 16, 1948.
This book is based on a review of all the papers published on dementia precox, as listed in the Quarterly Cumulative Index Medicus for the ten year period from 1936 to 1946. In all, the bibliography consists of about 3,200 papers, in a variety of languages. In preparing this review, an abstract was made of each paper. This material was then organized in the form of the present book. The book, however, is not just a blackboard for recording work that has been done. An effort is made also to take stock of what the accumulated information seems to add up to. "
Maybe read the graph next time?
Schizophrenia wasn't a "lifelong illness requiring lifelong meds" until they had a med to give. The graph shows CLEARLY that people do better off the meds.
DID is 100% the result of severe prolonged abuse starting early in childhood.