Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 12:55 a.m. No.2900295   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0299 >>0338 >>0368 >>0379 >>0414 >>0440 >>0447 >>0657 >>0905 >>1002

SAD!/SOG

Been digging into Afghanistan–particularly the attack on Forward Operating Base Chapman, where Ned Price's mentor Jennifer Lynn Matthews (and many others) were killed in a suicide bombing by a 'triple agent.' The best article I've read on it is here:

https://www.gq.com/story/dagger-to-the-cia?currentPage=1

 

I was surprised to learn that the CIA was running its own paramilitary army over there. We've heard the news speak of "Special Forces" going into other countries and training locals to fight their own battles…but I've always thought of those as the elite military units. That's actually only the case some of the time; other times, it's handled by the CIA's Special Access Division:

>The Special Operations Group (SOG) is a department within SAD responsible for operations that include high-threat military or covert operations with which the US government does not wish to be overtly associated.

>If they are compromised during a mission, the United States government may deny all knowledge. SOG is generally considered the most secretive special operations force in the United States. The group selects operatives from other special mission units such as Delta Force, DEVGRU, ISA, and 24th STS, as well as other United States special operations forces.

>SAD provides the President of the United States with an option when overt military operations and/or diplomatic actions are not viable or politically feasible. SAD can be directly tasked by the president or the National Security Council at the president's direction, unlike other US special mission forces.

>As the action arm of the CIA's Directorate of Operations, SAD/SOG conducts direct action missions such as raids, ambushes, sabotage, targeted killings and unconventional warfare (e.g., training and leading guerrilla and military units of other countries in combat). SAD/SOG also conducts special reconnaissance that can be either military or intelligence driven and is carried out by Paramilitary Officers (also called Paramilitary Operatives or Paramilitary Operations Officers) when in "non-permissive environments". Paramilitary Operations Officers are also fully trained case officers (i.e., "spy handlers") and as such conduct clandestine human intelligence (HUMINT) operations throughout the world.

>Under U.S. law, the CIA is authorized to collect intelligence, conduct counterintelligence and to conduct covert action by the National Security Act of 1947. President Ronald Reagan issued Executive Order 12333 titled "United States Intelligence Activities" in 1984. This order defined covert action as "special activities," both political and military, that the U.S. government would deny, granting such operations exclusively to the CIA. The CIA was also designated as the sole authority under the 1991 Intelligence Authorization Act and mirrored in Title 50 of the United States Code Section 413(e). The CIA must have a presidential finding issued by the President of the United States in order to conduct these activities under the Hughes-Ryan amendment to the 1991 Intelligence Authorization Act. These findings are then monitored by the oversight committees in both the U.S. Senate, called the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) and the U.S. House of Representatives, called the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Activities_Division

 

Were these the shitty-music-loving 'Operation Specialists' from Q#2063? Everything about them screams 'tool of the cabal'. While the President is supposed to issue a 'presidential finding' to Congress, the law is vague and only requires that the President notify them afterwards of activity 'in a timely fashion':

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_finding

 

What I've posted above is just scratching the surface. I recommend you read up on Jennifer Lynn Matthew's death–at first, I figured that she was deep state material, but now I'm not so sure—she may well have unearthed something that needed to remain "covered." Look up "Greg Vogle", who seems to have been directing these operations out of the US Embassy in Kabul around the time she died. Look up "Sherkhan Farnood", the guy who was supposedly behind flying $861 million in cash to Dubai out of Kabul Airport, who died in a Kabul prison about two weeks ago:

https://www.thenational.ae/world/asia/the-kabul-banker-who-almost-brought-afghanistan-to-its-knees-dies-in-prison-1.763900

 

Lots to dig on here, anons. I'd be willing to be that Kabul Airport cash is tied into Obama's nuke deal–that cash was flying into Dubai right around the time that Jake Sullivan and William Burns were conducting secret talks with Iran about it, and Iran was laundering money through Dubai.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 1:08 a.m. No.2900338   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0657 >>0905 >>1002

>>2900295

related:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-economy-idUSBRE82C0DJ20120313

 

>SUITCASES WITH $8 BILLION IN CASH

>Hadawal estimated that up to $8 billion in cash leaves Afghanistan’s airports every year, half of it from Kabul alone.

>“The $8 billion being taken out is double the total assets of the (central) bank,” said Hadawal. It is also nearly double the size of last year’s national budget.

>A U.S. government audit report last year found it was almost impossible to track where much of the billions of dollars spent on security and development projects in the last decade had gone given the country’s dysfunctional financial tracking system and poor bank oversight.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 1:12 a.m. No.2900352   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2900346

No. If some Conservative brings it up, they'll call him a conspiracy theory nut and say it was just a slip of the tongue. It's interesting for us, but it will be awhile before we can use it as evidence.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 1:30 a.m. No.2900408   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0427 >>0497

>>2900368

Is that from /pol?

 

I'm pretty sure that building the border wall isn't just about keeping illegal immigrants out. That's a big part of it (since it's what Americans want), but it's also about crippling the C_A/cabal's dark money streams—drugs, human trafficking, smuggling, etc.

 

Ever since I read the story of Dudus in Jamaica (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Coke), and all the bullshit that went on around it, I realized that this is how they work–they create chaos and operate within that chaos to capitalize on the situation and transfer wealth from one place to another.

 

The reason so much of Congress hasn't voted for the wall, despite there being a Republican majority, is that they're either being blackmailed, extorted, or receiving cash from the arrangement. And I bet the reason POTUS calls Maxine Waters 'stupid' is not just because she's actually stupid, but because she didn't take the deal that would've allowed her to step down without having her dirty laundry exposed to the world.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 1:41 a.m. No.2900440   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0459 >>0508 >>0657 >>0905 >>1002

>>2900379

lol, that's a puff-piece from the C_A's own website. How about this one:

CIA runs shadow war with Afghan militia implicated in civilian killings

>The highly secretive paramilitary unit has been implicated in civilian killings, torture, questionable detentions, arbitrary arrests and use of excessive force in controversial night raids, abuses that have mostly not been previously disclosed.

>The highly secretive paramilitary unit has been implicated in civilian killings, torture, questionable detentions, arbitrary arrests and use of excessive force in controversial night raids, abuses that have mostly not been previously disclosed.

>The KPF is so feared that several people interviewed spoke under the condition of anonymity because they worried for their lives. Others spoke on the record because they wanted their experiences told.

>The CIA is not bound by the Bilateral Security Agreement between Afghanistan and Washington that, among other rules, limits the ability of U.S. military forces to enter Afghan homes. The night raids, for the most part banned in 2013 by former president Hamid Karzai, were quietly reinstated by the U.S.-brokered coalition government of President Ashraf Ghani in an effort to better combat the Taliban. But Afghans consider the intrusions offensive.

>The CIA is not subject to human rights vetting procedures under the Leahy Law, which proscribes the use of American taxpayer dollars to assist, train or equip any foreign military or police unit perpetrating gross human rights violations.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/cia-backed-afghan-militias-fight-a-shadow-war/2015/12/02/fe5a0526-913f-11e5-befa-99ceebcbb272_story.html?utm_term=.6577a282c3d5

 

This is the same area (Khost) that I referred to in this post–where Ned Price's mentor was the base commander:

>>2900295

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 1:51 a.m. No.2900476   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0493 >>0535 >>0963

>>2900459

I am, just a little while longer.

 

You hear about it all the time in movies, etc., but never really in the news. They just say "special forces" or something like it, and I've always assumed they were military. Since SOG largely recruits from the special forces, the associate becomes even closer…but until you see that this operation is run by the CIA, that they're virtually invisible to the public and most of Congress, and that they report to the President…the gravity of it doesn't hit you.

 

I guess all those references of corrupt nutcases flying helicopters through third-world countries with suitcases of drugs was a lot more accurate than I realized.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 2:09 a.m. No.2900556   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0600 >>0608 >>0638 >>0983

>>2900509

Q called him out. They've got him nailed for sure.

 

From what I've seen, there have been three Senators consistently calling for war: John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Joe Lieberman. Joe Lieberman is kind of out of the picture, but I knew Lindsey Graham was dirty–the only question was how dirty? I guess if he isn't stepping down, it's either because he isn't all that dirty, or he's so dirty that he'll pretty much do whatever he's told.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 2:15 a.m. No.2900584   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0613

>>2900535

What I know now, after all these months, is that I haven't known anything at all, and I'm starting at the beginning. Things that I would dismiss mentally as improbable are no longer improbable. I was the one that shot down rumors–I'm the skeptic that people looked to for detached analysis. So I'm looking forward to the day that all of this is revealed, so I can reassure those close to me that I haven't lost my mind.

 

I would have read that Washington Post article about the C_A killing civilians and dismissed it out of hand as some grubby 3rd-worlders trying to get cash from our government. Now I believe them. So I also believe that there are members of the special forces that have been corrupted. In fact, just recently I read about two of them killing another member of the special forces (different division) because he wouldn't go along with their bullshit.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 2:38 a.m. No.2900664   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0668 >>0678

>>2900613

That's the one.

 

I'm still skeptical. It's my nature. It's just a matter of how you choose to weigh for authority; I used to give weight to a solid argument made by a cable news anchor, now I am suspicious of absolutely everything said by them. It's going to be a different world, having to critically evaluate every statement made. I realized last night that the only difference between scheduled programming and the commercials that separate them is that we know commercials are meant to manipulate us.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 2:45 a.m. No.2900685   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0693

>>2900668

I see cable news and commercials as being the same now, yes. Just that we know commercials are meant to manipulate us into buying something, while news was supposedly meant to inform us. The truth is that they're one and the same.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 2:49 a.m. No.2900701   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2900600

I'm not personally excited by Kavanaugh, but POTUS has hedged his bet and decided that it's better to get one guy on for sure now than to wait until after the election. In order to do that he had to go with kind of the Neocon pick, IMO. I will say, however, that his record on gun rights is stellar.

 

I bet he goes with the more controversial pick after the election. Then Gowdy replaces RBG, and we're good.

Anonymous ID: 367470 Sept. 6, 2018, 2:54 a.m. No.2900712   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2900608

Lindsey Graham has always struck me as a snake, but a really damned smart one. I'm sure that McCain had something on him, and I'm sure that Graham had something on McCain. I'm absolutely positive that POTUS and Q have Graham exactly where they want him, and he'll dance and sing whatever tune they want him to sing. We'll hear some opposition from him on occasion, because otherwise people would grow suspicious…but just like Schumer shut up after he visited the White House, Graham's performance is the only thing saving him from having all of his dirty laundry aired and being thrown in jail. He'll dance, not like his life depends on it, but because his life depends on it.