Anonymous ID: 333758 Sept. 6, 2018, 5:55 a.m. No.2901628   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1641

looking at op ed NYT

 

professional writer probably in house as I thought. Dinesh thinks so too.

 

If not, was looking at cabinet members.

 

I thought this one was a weird choice, John DeStefano, formally John Boehner staffer; currently head of:

 

Presidential Personnel , so would be in frequent access and discussions, probably requires some clearance too, in order to access personnel files.

 

5 minutes of bitching to NYT and editor takes liberties and stitches up a hit piece?

 

Who is to say? Results matter, fake news doesnt.

_

_

Anonymous ID: 333758 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:12 a.m. No.2901734   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2901684

oh i saw that ;

 

you could say that you need a disruption in "frequency" represented by patterns in order to create, perhaps the frequency slows and seperates partly but exists as a parallel, because matter is a specific rate of energy at a higher density; and who is to say that what is perceived as fast energy/frequencies wouldnt be a 'body' or matter if you resonated at a higher state.

 

i like these thought experiments and that you use software to show your work.

 

looking at a 'twist' ?

define ground state.

 

I see what you are saying but should exactly know your premise; I visualize sets of spinning rods whose arcs create their own tangent patterns and systems; its a basic visual of how new patterns are created off the first by a change in motion or movement on a plane; an acceleration in any movement changes the created system entirely; what you present is a kind of model for your idea and its important to point out that this is one possible way to explain your theory; we are not looking at the arc of truth so to speak, but a working model; im sure you acknowledge that. (statement is more for anons who didnt follow)

_