>>2901039 (pb)
I disagree. The guy mis-spoke. Maybe it was a Freudian slip and he subconsciously believes No Name was killed, because the story and whole context does not add up
He wasn't announcing it.
I believe No Name is alive. This dude likely doesn't know that
"People who know the plan are a very small number" ~
>>2900997 (pb)
K's totally an insider for all these major crimes. It might be a feature rather than a bug, since he will turn?
The info they have on "him" will get a lot of other people in trouble beside himself.
I have no idea why the Dems beg to get these papers released.
I think they still don't "get" the overall picture of what is going on.