Anonymous ID: c29c87 Sept. 6, 2018, 5:15 a.m. No.2901382   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2901367

Why are you telling anons what to do? Should anons think for themselves? Do you have censorship authority?

 

If Jim Watkins is a pig farmer in Asia, is BO a Reddit boomer?

 

Does BO censor anons? Does he have authority?

Did Q vet BO?

Anonymous ID: c29c87 Sept. 6, 2018, 5:18 a.m. No.2901399   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1420

Who vetted BO? How? Source?

 

If BO is a Reddit boomer, and controls the vetting of bakers 100%, then what are they? Why does authority over bread fall in hands of shadowy, bizarre, redditboomeresque BO? Isn't that a red flag?

Anonymous ID: c29c87 Sept. 6, 2018, 5:22 a.m. No.2901424   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1431

>>2901405

Well, nothing is simple. The board is infiltrated and internally disrupted. Counteracting that should not be equated to "being exactly like leftists!", to quote you're obsolescent term. But the problem is, THE VERY ELEMENTS THAT ARE INFILTRATING THIS BOARD ARE CENSORING HUMANS. Do you see the problem, and its complexity?

 

How do you feel about the Redditboomer question? Be honest.

Anonymous ID: c29c87 Sept. 6, 2018, 5:25 a.m. No.2901444   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2901408

Good thing this post is not an iteration of a stock response that is repeated over and over, and that could be easily thought to be merely an algorithmic outputting, eh? Because that would suck for you human anon!

Anonymous ID: c29c87 Sept. 6, 2018, 5:32 a.m. No.2901485   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2901477

Do you think they are human? Reddit boomers? CIbotA? What are you basing your assumptions on? Do you find that others find you believable? Based on what? Thanks.

Anonymous ID: c29c87 Sept. 6, 2018, 5:45 a.m. No.2901564   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2901552

Sword anon! A very human anon! Thank it! Thank the thing! ThanQQ sword anon, for being ahumanredditbloomersword anonser! You are the REAL heroes!!!!