Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:22 a.m. No.2901796   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1862

Jesus Christ, we pray for You to watch over our board

We pray for You to take control, and banish lies

We pray for You to inspire and guide us in all we do.

We pray for the advent of Your Kingdom [here]

And on earth.

 

Amen

Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:23 a.m. No.2901806   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2901788

Haha, kek, you are sleepy human anon baker, and you need to "hand off" to another human, that is human like you? Is that what you are saying wakey bakey baker boo anon!

 

ThanQQ to the baqers, the realz heroez!!!!

Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:25 a.m. No.2901815   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1822

>>2901805

>>2901804

Oh wow, awesome spam by human anons that are not bots that appear like clockwork every thread and scarcely vary their monotonous output! Such realistically human anon spam anons! Awesome!

 

Follow suit and thank the bakers slavishly everyone! Do what the notbots are cueing you to do, on this here internets that is not controlled by an AI propaganda system! Woohoo!

Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:33 a.m. No.2901880   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2901854

ThanQQ baqer thanqqer! Let us all thank the baqers obsessively, because it is so realistic for us to do so! It doens't reveal fakery, because it's not fake. WE are obsesssed with the bakers, that human BO vets, opaquely, in order to control our information on this board that is not a clown op! Awesome anons, Love to UUU and all the baqers!!!

Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:39 a.m. No.2901942   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1976 >>2055

>>2901900

You are surely convincing humans that I'm a bot by posting this one-line post humananonfaganon. God knows, I can hardly appear human myself in the face of your articulate humanness, the latter of which is not confined to clinging to repetitive botesque one-liners. No, not in the least are YOU so confined, human. So um, I'll recloak now fam!

Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:44 a.m. No.2902008   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2055

>>2901976

I am not sure what you are trying to say notbotanon. What exactly are you asserting as your justification for being mad? I will be happy to do my best to address any concerns you have, within reason. But if you carry on like some limited-output propaganda bot, then we can hardly interact like humans. So come to the table. Let's talk this out like men.

Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:52 a.m. No.2902085   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2902055

I am sorry, but you are just outputting botesque shilling points. Talk to me. We are both humans, right? So drop the chan-cliche lingo for a moment. Drop the stereotyped posing. Talk to me. What is our common ground? What do you believe in? What do you think the "infiltration and internal disruption" of this board consists of? Why do you care?

 

We can talk man to man, right human?

Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 6:53 a.m. No.2902102   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2166

>>2902084

LOL, no reason to be furious anon. The amazingness of the fact of the slip would seem to overrride these stereotyically bitter chan attitudes. Why are you mad? Think about it. Or try to think about it. lol. Are you NOT full of joy right now? How?

Anonymous ID: f3fe65 Sept. 6, 2018, 7:01 a.m. No.2902187   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2902152

If I say, "drop the chan lingo and talk to me man to man", and the poster I'm addressing fails to respond, but then you quote the post, and produce YET MORE botesqye chan cliches, then what are humans reading along going to think?

 

The problem that the bot system has is that it CLINGS DESPERATELY to a fixed stock of post forms, which are all forms of stereotyped "chan" talk. The strict necessity of clinging in this way makes it all too obvious who is a bot, and who is not. And it is a problem that can't be overcome. Therefore, the bot system should, at the very least, drastically reduce its output, if it doesn't want to keep outting its falsity so stupidly.

 

YMMV, loserbots