>>2904131

re-read crumbs

>>2904118

re-read crumbs

>>2904125

re-read crumbs

seriously anons.

fokkssakes.

if that's news to you…. ugh.

>>2904187

now that's one way to get moving

wunderbar

>>2904207

>not everyone is gonna re read crumbs

<not everyone is gonna call stupid notables

>>2904303

> DEFINATELY NOT NOTEABLE

Throwback Thursday Notable, if any.

If we had a section for that, might be useful for all the new kids on the block

>>2904373

>Not on YT as a livestream

>Not on any of the 200 or so cspan channels

how in tarnation

>>2904418

livelink here? >>2904413

>>2904459

>new wave

spotted

>>2904467

been done before.

they don't use it, that's not their point.

>>2904505

>You're growing weak

lovely projection you got there…

you only fool the freshest among us, boy.

all you have is re-runs.

>>2904534

That's not the angle, it's the methods/spamming.

Content would not be such an issue if they were able not to be complete and utter dicks aboutit

>>2904656

is it actually confusing ID and tripcode?

…

…

..not… a good look

>>2904787

yes. in November 2017 it was.

>>2904801

>best Q proof of all

not at all

leaves a lot of room for deniability

there are many much, much, MUCH stronger