Remember that former FBI director James Comey had used a long time friend to convey slightly similar opinion based material to a New York Times editor? The Democratic Party hacks at the Times drool puddles when presenting yet another poisonous entree to disparage President Donald Trump. The NYT served this pungent stew of leftover opinions in a silver chafing dish, insufficiently disguised with the garnish of rare and costly "authority".
Yet no gaudy garnishes or splash of hot sauce can fool sober minded people that the New York Times keeps serving the same old slop. This time they earnestly hope the their "Shocking New Revelation Ragout" contains enough mind poisoning equivalents to botulism, salmonella, and e-coli to paralyse our President and incapacitate the part of the public who support the President. They despise Americans and take us for fools. But we are alert to their pattern of villainous tactics.
Yes, the name for what the New York Times would attempt to assist is unspeakable. It was done to President John F Kennedy in November 1963. Kennedy had been similarly and repeatedly accused of ignorant perfidy re: Russia. The villains here warn the President: " So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over."
Excerpted from the NYT "anonymous" commentary:
The result is a two-track presidency.
Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.
Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals.
On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.
This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.
Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.