New Q

>>2906216 (last bread)

>>2906397

Of course.. maybe doesn't read directly but info is certainly fed to him

>>2906399

Double checked it.

How is it even possible to put DOITQ….Q.jpg

The picture name should be random.

Probably around 1 in a billion chance. Someone please explain.

>>2906545

>>2906505

If twitter uses any decent hashing function, which they do, it should be close to impossible.

Hash function is a one way function.. there like no way to get the resulting filename to match DOITQ..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_function

>>2906640

how many coincidences do you need before it becomes impossible to contradict?

>>2906586

There's a show only for those watching ;)

>>2906789

>>2906793

With current computational speeds it would take lifetimes to reverse. That's why it's a "one-way" function.

Maybe Q's got some super gaming pc!

>>2906877

>>2906505

Its practically impossible to get the hash function used for filenames to give you the result you want (unless you have a super computer.)

I'm actually mindblown by how they accomplished this.

more truths:

>>2906624

>>2906793

>>2906789