>>2906374 (lb)
I read that, too, and it means that Preterists were right. Think about what THAT MEANS…
>>2906374 (lb)
I read that, too, and it means that Preterists were right. Think about what THAT MEANS…
Great, now I'm distracted.
Don't tease me, Q. Are we on schedule for a reveal?
>Probably around 1 in a billion chance. Someone please explain.
As per Q. So, there's a numbering sequence. Hexadecimal. You'd have to monitor the sequence, and estimate the best time to post in order to land that as your filename upon upload.
Or, you call the fucking headquarters of Twitter, as POTUS, and tell the mother fucker to change it to this filename or we'll shut your ass down now.
Yeah. 1 in a billion either way.
I wouldn't be playing stocks so much, unless you have REALLY good insider info, but restructuring the fed (in my best guess) would turn us back into a Treasury Bonds market. Nice, stable, interest gains and very stable federal income source for gov't sustainability.
Just a guess, though.
Well, impossible for folks that don't have access to the computing power of the NSA…
kek. Sean Connery, Tom Selleck… Who's next? Lee Majors?
Welcome to chans, fren.