My thought was this:
If Kavanaugh is truthful, he would expose himself as a Black hat [and not get appointed].
If Kavanaugh lies [to look good in the hearing], he would incriminate himself [and not get appointed.
Is it a trap? Do they expect Kavanaugh to lie so they can use it against him?
Correct.
Why would they ask Kavanaugh about military tribunals and the current state after 911? To me, that was strange.
Kavanaugh:
Deep State background (Washington DC, Yale/Skull & Bones, Bush, wife worked for Bush).
RR asked states for AG's to investigate Kavanaugh for SC (1M+ pages collected).
Neil Gorsuch was not investigated at that extent.
Got questions about military tribunals and martial law during SC questioning.
It smells fishy…
>Filed by a citizen-backed coalition advocating vaccine safety, the lawsuit against the FDA alleged that the agency's continued endorsement and approval of thimerosal as a vaccine additive is a serious public health threat, especially since safer alternatives already exist and are widely used voluntarily by many vaccine manufacturers. But Judge Brett Kavanaugh, siding with antiquated pseudoscience, decided that thimerosal is not a health threat, and that those who wish to avoid it can simply choose thimerosal-free alternatives.
>
>The fact that Judge Kavanaugh refused to hear the case is tragic in and of itself, as thimerosal, which is composed of 50 percent mercury, has been proven to cause serious health damage.
Source: https://sweetremedyfilm.blogspot.com/2012/04/fda-admits-in-court-case-that-vaccines_01.html
Kavanaugh defends Obamacare:
>In the latest case, Judge Brett Kavanaugh broke with the other two justices on the panel and said the court did not have jurisdiction to decide the case.
>
>In his 65-page dissent he wrote that the Anti-Injunction Act, "limits the jurisdiction of federal courts over tax-related matters" and said the penalty charged for not having insurance is a tax.
Source: https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Obama-healthcare-court-appeal/2011/11/08/id/417254/