I can't help but think who has the most power on Twitter. POTUS, by far.
By banning big names publicly, during hearings revolving around beaning people, and their stocks sliding - this all seems like intentionally bad optics.
Could this be the deepstate attempting to do a controlled demolition of twitter to silence POTUS direct line of communications with the people?
No doubt in my mind this was Jones's intent.
The one platform that didn't ban him - and he spergs out on the head of the company in front of 20 million cameras. This was intentional.
That's not necessarily true. Q said MOS backed, not MOS controlled.
It might be. Just throwing it out there.
I think it's safe to assume the backing comes in the form of funding/access. Beyond that, what else do they have to hold over his head?
I see a move to regulate all forms of social media. This only helps that cause.