>>2916341 p.b.
Why is the rose a socialist symbol?
It looks fine on the surface but underneath you'll find as bunch of pricks
>>2916341 p.b.
Why is the rose a socialist symbol?
It looks fine on the surface but underneath you'll find as bunch of pricks
Anybody who attaches the slightest credibility to the output of the hard left BBC needs their head examining. A source of lies and leftist propaganda.
Any professional writer in the Intel community can successfully imitate somebody else's style with the aim of incriminating someone and causing division.
This analysis is worthless.