Anonymous ID: 7c9279 Sept. 7, 2018, 8:16 a.m. No.2919957   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2919757

So basically, anyone with know-how can go into a previous chat and change what was stated to make it appear as though a person said something else but actually did not?

 

By the way, WHY has NO ONE asked POTUS about Q yet? We've put up with all the articles and deniers, including Jack Posobiec, claiming Q is a LARP (with even people like Scott Adams believing him; wanting him nominated for a Pulitzer Prize).

 

WHEN will someone ask the only man in the nation who can actually tell us once and for all about Q's validity?

 

Not ONE "journo" has done this - including Jim "I'm Gonna Get on my Soapbox and Give a Speech and Tag a question on the End of it" Acosta.

 

This is ABSURD and not to complain, but it seems to me that the information that COULD be released is taking WAY too long to come out. Why is this? I understand parameters and certain things need to be in place. I'm not doubting Q. I'm simply wondering if there is SO much that cannot be trivialized, denied, or explained away, why not let more of it out?

 

Forgive my impatience…