>If they can make you into a public figure, "You get nothing, there it is, black and white, plain as day, you lose, good day sir.
Yeppers - this ain't the UK
How about someone stepping forward with what they think the specific trap even is?
Otherwise, it's just the usual gibs me muh notable routine.
>Have you not thought about why DOJ appointed the equivalent of 100 full-time lawyers for weeks to review Kavanaugh SC nomination?
No - total swamp move since he's the Justice that cements the 5-4 advantage. If POTUS issued any orders to do that then I'm open to consideration.
>That feels strange if they think he is a good candidate. Perhaps they want to introduce Kavanaughs documents as evidence, something they can do under the cover of reviewing him for SC.
That's a big stretch. One of the most important nominees in ages was put there just to get evidence?