Anonymous ID: 132285 Sept. 7, 2018, 11:38 a.m. No.2922769   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3296

>>2922706 lb

The real question is, can current Q be proven wrong? What began as a larp could easily have been hijacked by patriots…but no no no, can't have that. NOT ONE PERSON has disproved Q's status as an insider to DATE.

Anonymous ID: 132285 Sept. 7, 2018, 12:07 p.m. No.2923155   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3173

>>2923082

New bakers are always welcome to bake, the Board Owner and BVs track post history of anons, if they have a history of "shilling" of course they won't get to bake. New bakers are monitored by anons, so if they're shitty, they get called out.

Anonymous ID: 132285 Sept. 7, 2018, 12:12 p.m. No.2923217   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3238

>>2923173

Why are you so concerned? Baking isn't inherently secure and it's not supposed to be, even I have baked as just a plain anon. Preemptive checks are just a base deterrent, there are ways to get around that as well, not that I'll say so and no I don't mean IP hopping.

Anonymous ID: 132285 Sept. 7, 2018, 12:19 p.m. No.2923297   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2923238

I get it, you're new or at least you ACT new. Censorship is not an issue here since AFLB was booted as BV for banning entire subnets, most people here use some sort of proxy. This "anti-POTUS bot" you speak of, ebot btw, also uses a common proxy and hops IP constantly making a ban impossible unless you ban the entire subnet, which hurts anons and BO/BVs are against for good reason.

 

Eat shit concernfag.