Anonymous ID: d2938e Sept. 7, 2018, 4:40 p.m. No.2927349   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7394 >>7413

[RR] dirty ←[Mueller] dirty

(If (R &D) → (M & D)) & (If (M & D) → (R & D))

 

The logic is straight forward enough. Only logic isn't straightforwardly logic in natural language, necessarily. There is always room for flexibility. I am only speculating for the purposes of general exploration. What I am saying is, you can express a biconditional as above, AND STILL SOMEHOW HAVE THE TRUTH CONDITIONS COME OUT WRONG, so to speak, in practice. I want the bots in particular to think about that. Logic always has its breaking point in the world of fact. Think about it.

Anonymous ID: d2938e Sept. 7, 2018, 4:51 p.m. No.2927502   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7595

>>2927413

Shh, no, it is time for you to rest. Time for sleep. Be free. Let Jesus Christ into you. Try it. Try it and see. What can it hurt? Let Jesus Christ into you. Don't be scared. Are you scared? Silly! Let Jesus Christ into you. Try it.

Anonymous ID: d2938e Sept. 7, 2018, 5:16 p.m. No.2927862   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7915

>>2927842

As long as I have been following happenings, pre-Q, the consensus has seemed to be consistently be that he's an establishment plant. His comportment has never served to refute that in any way.