hhmmmm is there a way to test this at Turn it In?
well no one I know has a membership, but surely someone out there has access
Nice work anon
I have long been a proponent of Muller and Rosenstine possibly being white hats. However, I find myself flipping back and forth between the the two narratives as Q drops are provocatively ambiguous. Purposely so but still…. my discernment is getting a workout.
Glad I'm not alone in this
with or on ….anon? don't worry about it, I'll assume you meant "with"
Agreed! And yet… why the need for ambiguity if Mueller and RR are black hats? The common narrative among Trump supporters in general is that these two are bad….just as they believe Sessions is bad. But, the question is, why would Q need to make it ambiguous if they are bad? To what purpose? He doesn't pretend Comey or McCabe are anything but diabolical traitors. If If RR and BM are both white hats, then of course he would want to hide that from the cabal and pretty much anyone else too save the most astute anons who would be able to see the greater more complicated plan and be able to explain it to others when this is all over.
Let me tell you, if they are white hats, then this ambiguity is working. The Left want to carve heroic statues of them and the right want to put them in the public square stocks. The media, the politicians, and the general public see them directly opposed to everything Trump wants to do and therefore nothing they do or come out with that helps POTUS could be accused of being politically motivated and tainted.
So…I guess my point is… The very fact that Q is being ambiguous at all, points to them both being white hats.