Indeed. The killbox is used in a variety of ways, and only consistently for a few of the "actors" in this grand play. There is a far greater need to convince the left that RR and RM are black hats than there is to convince the rest of us they are white hats.
That is, after all, how Trump operates.
Then make logical comments you nitwit.
Yes, because he looks like someone from 70 years ago he MUST be a bad guy. Way to promote the logic there, anon.
Ya know, that's what's fucked up. In the multiverse theory, every possibility is played out somewhere.
Even ones in which I am a head on a sexy robot body, stomping my opposition. I like that.
I haven't seen it mentioned… any digs on the "Mifsud is missing, presumed dead" thing?
PDop's handler.
Sauce? We have no evidence of this, only conjecture. Prove it.
That's not logic, that's CONJECTURE. FFS, logic isn't that difficult. Thinking it is true, assuming, IS NOT LOGIC.
And you must be the fuckwit that thinks an assumption is somehow tied to logic. Both require a lack of assumption. Try it.
Maybe.
But any guesses are just that, guesses. Inductive reasoning actually requires evidence, not guesses. Disagreeing with his conclusions is not evidence, it is conjecture.
I don't disagree with that. I just take issue with people asserting their conjecture as fact or "inductive logic." It is neither. We literally have no choice but to wait until we know more. Certainly we should demand that we be given more, but the current state of our union is not one that offers up that information.
They never will. Not unless Q "forces" the issue. They can't without exposing their complicit activities.
Fair guess.
Twatter folk are jumping on Fiona Hill right now. I've seen nothing convincing either way.
Only if you completely take down the cabal. Remember, like it or not, our founding fathers committed treason against Great Britain. The winners are the ones that get to decide what is a crime, however.
I know my heritage back to the 1700s, and only a handful of people have the same last name as I do, all of which I know personally (well, except 1). I probably know of a half dozen people (public personalities) I resemble well enough for a stranger to think I'm either related to, or directly descended from.
Unfortunately, people legitimately fear a bullet to the back of the head without warning.
This is exactly what I've been saying. We have no idea what "white hat" government officials were thinking in 2001. IF there was something fishy, and IF it was perpetrated by the government, what exactly were they going to do? For that matter, who was going to testify? What evidence would they get to see? Bad all around.
True dat.
Why not just research the people that are implementing AI? They're out there. It's not nearly as dangerous as people make it out to be. None has passed a Turing test yet, and serious researchers (there aren't many) aren't too concerned. They know AI is very task limited, i.e., it works really well for the single-minded task it is programmed for. True "thinking" AI is quite a way off from current capabilities.
AI is useful. AI is what is used to run the bots that drive us nuts in here. It is also used to mimic very limited human behavior for silly demonstrations to the public. My favorite legitimate use is for video game baddies… It's definitely better than the first time I looked into it 30 years ago, but still not about to take over the world. AI adapts to the thing it is programmed to adapt to. Humans, real people, have the ability to adapt to anything. Literally ANYTHING.