Anonymous ID: 798b82 Sept. 7, 2018, 11:20 p.m. No.2932028   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2355

>>2932014

I've got news for anyone who thinks MI isn't at least partially comp'd as well. Anyone who knows anything about JFK's death knows this. Now, the real problem is that the compartmentalized nature of it allows for abuses from select actors while the majority are unawareโ€ฆ

 

That's why most POTUS's are pre-controlled.

 

CoG is relevant in this.

Anonymous ID: 798b82 Sept. 7, 2018, 11:31 p.m. No.2932106   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2116

>>2932097

Oh, I recognize from your response you are the same person who failed the comprehend the difference between inductive and deductive logic last time I tried to explain it to you.

 

Of course I left some of the steps out, but it is indeed inductive logic.

Anonymous ID: 798b82 Sept. 7, 2018, 11:36 p.m. No.2932142   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2932116

I don't fault you for wanting evidence, but thats deductive logic, and failing a leak confirming, all we have to rely on is inductive. Inductive is working backwards from many pieces of varied knowledge and experience to form a bigger picture.

 

Why would a high level person in the FBI be replaced right before a major event like 9/11? It could be coincidence, aka normal shift players. (falsifiable?) It could be deliberate. If deliberate, there are only a few reasons that follow. For example, perhaps whoever he replaced had fucked up (verifiable?)

 

I think, out of expanding on that thinking further, in the end the two main possibilities we end up with are that he was placed there as cover, either through incompetence or competence.

 

For example, we can see this modus operandi in other weeks before 9/11 appointments/shifts, such as John ONeill.

Anonymous ID: 798b82 Sept. 8, 2018, 12:06 a.m. No.2932315   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2363

>>2932297

Right, but at the same time, this logic can literally be used to cover for any of themโ€ฆ which is what makes it so dangerous. We need more than just conjecture that that is what happened.

 

Literally anyone could be /ourguy/ with this logic. Now think, who does that kind of wishful thinking serve?

Anonymous ID: 798b82 Sept. 8, 2018, 12:23 a.m. No.2932412   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

That's it guys, pack it up. All of the blackhats are really just whitehats who have been quietly waiting for Q/Trump all these years (17+). Yep, thats it! They are /ourguys/ for sho!