^^^
agree
GermanArchiveAnon's archive of breads
https://mega.nz/#F!LPZxEIYJ!N5JwCNoxOxOtAoErKdUgvw
Memefarmer's archive of images (near 7.4 GB).
Q RESEARCH GRAPHICS LIBRARY
https://mega.nz/#F!XtNhURSb!1Mdrvt-Y_onBw5VlFDRdCQ
26,000+ memes and infographs (File names contain searchable keywords.)
>>2933474 Am willing to go into battle with him if he's on the far side of the line from me. But not if he's behind me.
No matter what he was smoking, the video gave an impression. The question is WHY? You don't have CEOs of other companies giving interviews in their pajamas; they try to project the impression, to their shareholders, of solidity, control, dignity, knowledge, confidence, etc. rather than deliberately trying to undermine all those perceptions with a stunt. So WHY?
Guess you got lucky. The algorithm is a function of your IP@ and the bread ID. I suppose there's some non-zero chance of a duplicated ID, but it won't happen often.
That was the one explanation I could think of that seemed to fit the circumstances. Spouseanon said no though. (Sometimes I'm right even when spouseanon disagrees… kek)
Wish lawfag would say if that 'stunt' was grounds for a shareholder lawsuit to manipulate the stock price to his advantage and to shareholders' disadvantage.
Give them opportunity to do something bad while eyes were watching them. Grounds for outing and indictment? Even if all had been pardoned by Hussein for prior activities?