Anonymous ID: 99a632 Feb. 7, 2018, 6:33 a.m. No.294115   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>294110

>ess conference and the MS-13 numbers he was throwing around, it is quite possible that all those sealed indictments are gang members. The only saving thing about that being the case, is I don't know why they would keep sitting on them instead of processing them to get rid of the backlog.

 

To fuck with you. To make you think the swamp is being drained, while they finalize their positions.

Anonymous ID: 99a632 Feb. 7, 2018, 6:49 a.m. No.294199   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4238

>>294184

Answer any of the questions I have, and I'll shut up. SInce you fucking can't explain the lack of satellites, ISS, stars, or the moon, you are a fucking RETARD if you believe the fakers at NASA/SPACE X whatever the fuck.

Anonymous ID: 99a632 Feb. 7, 2018, 6:51 a.m. No.294216   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>294190

I do not accept your answer. it makes NO SENSE. From the orbit at the distance shown, some artifacts of satellites should be seen.

 

Now, NO ISS, NO MOON, NO STARS.

 

You space fags are fucking stupid if you believe the great deception of man. Especially with footage that has so many flaws.

Anonymous ID: 99a632 Feb. 7, 2018, 6:55 a.m. No.294240   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>294222

How about you simply explain why (with validity) Why we didn't see

A) satellites (not one)

B) ISS (it goes around the earth quickly)

C) Stars

D) The moon

 

You are a fucking fool if you believe in fake space, but can't explain those elements that are missing from the video.

 

Since you can't answer strait up questions, with rational answers, it's because YOU HAVE NONE.