Anonymous ID: 1da723 Sept. 8, 2018, 7:52 a.m. No.2934319   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4355 >>4372

>>2934210

What was your methodology for you confidence level? It's kind of hard to say someone is 50% or higher if you have absolutely no reference to anything related to an InfoWars entity. You've got dozens of random Twatter accounts at 70% or higher with nothing more than their Twitter handles.

Anonymous ID: 1da723 Sept. 8, 2018, 8:11 a.m. No.2934476   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2934397

Look, (((they))) have no choice but to try and infiltrate the Q movement. They know it's grown too much, so this is to be expected.

And yes, this clearly looks like a plant, but it's probably not the first and won't be the last.

Anonymous ID: 1da723 Sept. 8, 2018, 8:23 a.m. No.2934567   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2934471

Right, but they are all high confidence to be associated with IW influence network. Why is that? What am I missing?

Genuinely trying to understand