REPOSTING - This needs more visibility.

==

Alex Jones has built a huge influence network. This is crazy, in fact I keep trying to disprove it but I can't.

I've spent months mapping this out. It includes former Presidential candidates, and personalities reaching MILLIONS of people.

There are probably personalities on this list that you trust/follow, so connect the dots and verify this for yourself.

Infowar influence network members share common characteristics, they love to claim censorship from any source they can find as it build their perceived credibility (and this was before the big bans). Many tend to push crypto, have hollywood connections, and there are is a large representation of particular new media outlets.

They love to play both sides of the fence and pit their actors against one another to simulate pseudo realistic situations.

For example, they are all neither pro, nor anti Q. You have some that are pro Q (Jordan Sather), and others that oppose vigorously (Lee Stranahan).

It's all part of their show, which is one big scripted movie (potentially the reason for all the actors on this list). So how do you think Q fits into this? That is an open question.

>>2934210

Just a few callouts of bigger personalities with strong connections to infowars influence network:

1) Joe Rogan

2) Roger Stone

3) Ron Paul

4) Steven Crowder

5) Milo

6) Lionel

7) Jordan Sather

8) Lee Stranahan

9) Steve Molyneux

10) Jordan Peterson

11) Sargon of Akkad

12) Steven Crowder

>>2934319

Who are you referring to? May be able to shed some light…

>>2934347

Can you be a little more specific who you are referring to, I may be able to shed some light.

>>2934405

This was compiled based on metadata and proximity of their connectedness to infowars vs. what Q did or did not say. It is theoretically possible someone could be VERY connected to infowars and also be a patriot of highest caliber. You'll have to research that and determine for yourself.

>>2934444

>>2934430

True, which is why not every infowars guest is on this list.

>>2934444

Some of those are pretty straightforward and simple google searches should answer your question.

Fuctupmind is a little more complex - his connection is through 0Hour1

>>2934281

Yes, I agree, and he is on the radar, just not at a 75% confidence level…but that can change with additional data. Do you have any direct connections between him and infowars you can share?

>>2934634

You can add to that control of much of the "Alt-Right" as well…it's likely the infowars influence network is a direct response to the decline in old media as a way to keep control of their influence.

>>2934639

The real orchestration and show right now is in the social media networks where we move each and every day.

A true echo chamber as demonstrated by the infowars influence network.

>>2934545

Possible anon, after seeing all this fuckery though and the magnitude at which it happened, not sure who to trust (including Q). There are obviously very powerful forces attempting to control and influence.