>>2934828 pb
SIMILAR
I stated SIMILAR, not identical.
The Phil. Roth. pendants you shared are all different, so what exactly should be compared? >>2934863
These pendants ARE similar.
FACT: We do not know what exactly these pendants are as far as their composition. We think we know what they stand for and know a bit about the progression of them, the hierarchy of them. As far as them being identical from one individual to another, we know that PR's pendants (she has different ones) are not like Vanderbilts pendants and Michael O's pendant is unique as well. #44's pendant is similar to PR's.
FACT: Philippine Rothschild has MANY pendants. To say that the pendants are the same is erroneous. Therefore there is no SET configuration/type of pendant that we've been able to determine. Pendants seem to vary with the owner.
To discard this is ludicrous.