https://www.googletransparencyproject.org/sites/default/files/Google-Clinton-Report-11-28-16.pdf
Introduction
Google’s extraordinarily close relationship with President Obama’s administration led to
a long list of policy victories of incalculable value to its business.
An in-depth examination of the company’s efforts to extend that special relationship into the next administration, which it wrongly predicted would be led by Hillary Clinton, reveal what we might expect from Google for the incoming Trump administration.
Google’s executives and employees employed a variety of strategies to elect Hillary
Clinton and defeat Donald Trump. Google permeated Clinton’s sphere of influence on a
broad scale, rivaling the influence it exerted over the Obama administration. A review
found at least 57 people were affiliated with both Clinton—in her presidential campaign,
in her State Department, at her family foundation—and with Google or related entities.
In addition, 10 people who worked under Clinton at the State Department later joined
the New America Foundation, a Google-friendly think tank where Google’s Eric Schmidt
served as chairman and was one of its top donors.
Although the company and its chairman, Eric Schmidt, were ultimately unsuccessful in electing Clinton, their efforts underscore the profound and novel ways a corporation can influence our democracy beyond simple financial donations.
The Clinton campaign’s chief technology officer, Stephanie Hannon, came from Google,
as did the campaign’s chief product officer, Osi Imeokparia.
At least two other key Clinton campaign staffers, Derek Parham
and Jason Rosenbaum,also previously worked at Google.
Several outside firms connected to Google also worked on the Clinton 2016 campaign. Those included Civis Analytics and The Groundwork, two companies that compiled data and polling on voters for the campaign and that were funded by Google’s Schmidt.
Hillary for America spent more than $590,000 on services from The Groundwork and at least $48,000 on Civis Analytics in this campaign cycle.
Clinton’s primary super PAC, Priorities USA, has spent more than $800,000 with Civis Analytics
this cycle.
Had she won the election, Clinton would have been significantly indebted to Google and Schmidt, whom she has referred to as
her “longtime friend.”
For comparison, Schmidt’s future team at
Civis Analytics was credited with helping produce his five million vote margin of victory during Obama’s 2012 election,and Schmidt subsequently enjoyed extensive access at the Obama White House.
Schmidt took on a similarly active role from the earliest days of the Clinton 2016 campaign, helping design, finance, and implement its digital voter targeting operation. Internal campaign emails released by WikiLeaks show that Schmidt met with the team working on Clinton’s incipient campaign on April 2 and 3, 2014, before it was even
announced.
Just three months after the meetings, with future campaign chairman
John Podesta and former Clinton State Department aide Cheryl Mills, The Groundwork
was incorporated and housed near the Clinton campaign headquarters to work on her
voter-targeting effort.
Schmidt met regularly with Clinton advisors during the campaign to discuss issues such
as where the voter-targeting operation should be located and how to compile all
accessible information about voters in a single file.
After meeting with Schmidt in April 2014, the future Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta reported: “he’s ready to fund, advise, recruit talent, etc. Google’s support of Clinton extended beyond Eric Schmidt: the company over which he
presides was a significant source of funds for both her campaign and her family
foundation. Google is the Clinton campaign’s largest corporate contributor. Google
employees, including at least six high-ranking executives, donated more than $1.3
million to Clinton’s 2016 campaign.
More at Link!