>>2940561

That's the problem with dialogue about this…right there. If you don't believe FE then you believe NASA. not necessarily connected, but ALWAYS connected in these discussions. This anon doesn't believe/trust NASA for a second and anyone who has dug the history there couldn't…that said the arguments for FE are ridiculous (btw those who want to cite scripture for FE don't know scripture, the best you can come up with is a domed & hollow earth if you are extreme literalist).

Personally i think the dynamic plasma/electric universe model along with radiation is why we have not had a manned flight beyond high orbit.

I just get so disappointed when anons present these either-or arguments that leave an immense amount of critical thinking space on the table. Probably engaging shills but had my ranting jag…back to lurking moar. -blessings

>>2940993

can't answer for guy(s), but personally I don't know and honestly that is so low on the list of things that are of significance to me. The question for me is does the gvmnt lie/deceive it's citizens? once that is answered then the question becomes 'why?'

I find they lie(d) and continue about just about everything. So more interested in digging the why and possible end game, not the jot and tittle of each lie. just mho from my world view.