Anonymous ID: eb1561 Sept. 8, 2018, 7:37 p.m. No.2941269   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1277 >>1396 >>1463 >>1764

>>2941209

That would all be great if that's how it all worked.

 

You're assuming the file name mechanism of Twitter is one where you put in XYZ and get out ABC. That would not work at all, because literally thousands of people could be posting shit like "ClipboardImage.png" like we do here, and if it generated the file name by "X goes in, gets processed, and Y comes out"… you'd get a TON of file names being the same.

 

Nope… I have some experience in web development (over 20 years as an IT professional and web developer)… how it works is it DISCARDS the original file name and just makes a new one up. They're entirely random dude… So your entire theory is actually not even possible to achieve. It's literally IMPOSSIBLE for the Q team to have deliberately made a "DOITQ" file name…