>>294100

>Soon there will not be many of us left.

>Many are driven away.

Have to disagree very strongly. If anything more people become interested every day, worldwide. We're not here as a chat-board for Summer Patriots or twatters/facebergers/ledditors. This is workspace and also a meat-grinder. The faint of heart/snowflakes cannot remain here which is fine as they don't belong here anyway, which is why there are other sites/venues for them to participate in a "friendly" and "safe" environment.

Actual anons drift in and out depending on the day/time and their schedules, so you can't take participation at any one time to be representative of the whole.

And shills/trolls/clowns/twatter-facebergers sometimes invade/raid here, and you can't take that as a representative of the whole effort (by Patriot anons) here either.

Threadly reminder:

Don't respond to shills/trolls/clowns

Even to tell them "filtered"

Don't waste time/effort/post space for that.

We're here to do a JOB, which does not include persuading shills/trolls/clowns

>>294319

>>294342

The spreadsheet is a good resource for something like that

ALL Q posts, direct links + links to archived thread posts + images

I would dearly love help with the spreadsheet. I spent like 5 days tring to make a new spreadsheet on Smartsheet, to no avail, ended up putting it on gulag. I have the direct links to each Q post for all, but only to the post in the archived threads up to 1/8/18, >>32189, his announcement of his new board in /thestorm/. So I would love, LOVE some help if you are offering.

What I need -

use http:// qarchives.ml/

each Q post number in the spreadsheet (from 1/8 on)

• look at date & thread number on spreadsheet,

• find on the archive site (every thread Q posted in has a * after the date to make it easy to find),

• open the archive.fo for that thread (in 2nd column)

• find that post number, "copy link location"

→ paste that link into a txt document or something.

(also the same thing for the posts that Q responds to)

Up until 1/8, all the links for Q's posts (and those he responds to) look like this:

https:// 8ch.net/thestorm/res/22943.html#q23580

https:// archive.is/Y1tCe#selection-47061.0-47067.0

You can see the difference in pic related.

It's not difficult, but just time-consuming…

>>294347

It's definitely a tactic that is used. So is the method of being super aggressive and (frankly try-hard) in bitching about shilling & to/at anons who may or may not actually be shills (distraction, sow dissent/division, add frustration)

And I took your post in the spirit it was intended and agree. :)

>>294354

>Can an updated timeline spreadsheet be created on a page we can send a link to where normies can go to the page

I could create another spreadsheet linked to the main spreadsheet if anons want that…

main spreadsheet:

https:// docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g/edit?usp=sharing

It would also be nice to have one for

-politicians stepping down/not running for re-election

-CEOs resigning

>>294442

Thank you anon, for chiming in. I can't say how many times I've seen (((some))) try to highlight one/more posts and push it as "oooh a helper/Q-posting-as-anon" only to have the anon say sometimes even in the same bread, "No, not Q I'm just a person" and those same anons still push it later as Q!

While once or twice wold just be counted as a mistake/newfags, the repeated pattern and stubbornness of those pushing it is nefarious. And anons DO need to be alerted/warned of this tactic because - in addition to this tactic, I've seen several instances of clowns attacking the integrity of the records themselves

>rawtxt file iz all rong!

>missed some posts in spreadsheet!

(give fake Q posts, demand their addition)

And attacks on the record-keepers themselves

>incompetent

>arrogant/bossy/knowitall

All for a LARP right?

>>294567

Thank you so very, very much, anon. If you could make a list, by date/post # and the corresponding archive.fo post links, put it in a pastebin and link me, I will be forever grateful! If I'm not here/don't see you, you could also ask the baker to put your pastebin link into the "dough" and I'll always check that and ask that it be removed once I see it, and will notify anons here & the baker that it's done.

I'm having increasing demands on my time in meatspace so this will be an enormous help.

So to follow Q's instruction/statement

>News unlocks MAP

>future proves past

Here are a few "news" items from today & yesterday that are really relevant for our purposes. Some may have been shared here, but I've been out so have missed that (forgive, sorry) Pics related.

These are only from 2 sites, just perusing this morning to get caught up to a degree, and don't include any articles on the financial aspects from the last few days.

The point is - read, make the connections between what Q has mentioned/anons have found, current events and how they related to each other and peripheral items.

>Find the spiders

>Build the web ("map")

The spiders = players

The web ("map") is how they relate to each other, a NETWORK map

>News unlocks MAP

How these people overlap, relate to each other directly and indirectly.

We need careful attention and analysis from anons. Fuck the religious discussion (can happen anywhere), space bullshit, and all the other slide/distraction topics.

We have a SERIOUS JOB to do, POTUS is counting on us. Let's work together and get it done.

>>294879

All previous attempts to influence, shut us down have failed, they will keep trying. But if we ignore/sideline (quietly filter) and keep DOING OUR JOB, and working together at it, we are truly unstoppable.

Also - thank you to the anons who are supportive on the spreadsheet, it really means a lot. It may not be the go-to source for anons here (especially since you can't participate with input anymore), but it is read by MILLIONS WORLDWIDE and gets a LOT of traffic. It's great because it affords a nice buffer between our workspace that is here and the normies of the world.

>>294828

>>294867

>>294888

This is a beautiful graphic. We need to make more of things like this - graphically aesthetically pleasing, not overly wordy or cluttered. Conveys a lot of info simply, shows the relationships between each.

>>294976

It's not all that hard to make infographs liek that one - relatively simple, aesthetically pleasing, but most importantly

-does not attack a label

-does not attack the group we're trying to affect

-does use their own imagery/graphics/aesthetic

-does use their own lingo

-does use friendly language (us, we, our) which helps it come from someone in their own in-group so they will accept it more

We have to be smart & savvy about this - pic related is helpful