>>294241

>Jerome Corsi.

>Snopes is a left wing fraudulent outlet.

>The meme is correct. SNOPES IS A LEFT-WING, SOROS-BACKED PROPAGANDA OUTLET.

You believe everything that fat fuck says? You lemming. Have your mommy read read the Wikipedia entry to you dumbass. Never mind, here you go precious . . .

Critics of the site have falsely asserted that it is funded by businessman and philanthropist George Soros, or linked sites, but all of Snopes’s revenue is from advertising on the site.[2] The New York Times has stated:

All of Snopes’s revenue — Mr. Mikkelson says he doesn’t know what it is — come from ads. Facebook is not paying for its services. Nor is the billionaire George Soros funding the site, although that is sometimes asserted in anti-Snopes stories.[2]

Lemming . . .

>>294312

OK. If you're going to join the little girls in the sandbox and decide for us what to twat, maybe you can answer a question that they are unable, incapable and/or unwilling to.

Why don't you follow Q's instruction from nearly 2 weeks ago ( >>>/greatawakening/60 ) and promote #InternetBillOfRights ? I've come to believe since they don't and won't do this they may well be glowing clowns. Are you one to ? Or does this question seem like a good one to you?

They build ice cream cones and converse like they are 5 and playing war. They theorize about possible battle plans, but do not recognize that Q gave them the battle plan. He is one who knows where this is going. He is the one who is (at lest trying) to pull us along.

Now tell me, does this concern make sense to you? Of will you ignore this and pretend this info doesn't exist, just like their cute little glowing selves?

>>294387

kek

>>294438

That's to funny!