Anonymous ID: e30df5 Feb. 7, 2018, 7:12 a.m. No.294342   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4506

>>294319

archive work/verification?

a "best of" crumbs could be good, too, though necessarily subjective. But the entire Q drops are a pretty massive load of info right now, and finding new/pratical ways for newfags/normies/oldfags alike to re-read them is not easy - but shouldn't be too hard either.

Or you could try a different classification approach, have them not chronologically but by subject…

as long as the main archive is good, sideprojects like this can help expanded thinking

Anonymous ID: e30df5 Feb. 7, 2018, 7:27 a.m. No.294442   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4582 >>4584 >>4738

about this thing…

>>293480 HELP for us to learn COMMS?

 

Q's marker system with POTUS was all about the delta between some of his posts and some of POTUS' tweets… not about this thing with almost random comments.

This is an extrapolation based on the system: some examples were found and displayed, but based on all of Q comms, i don't see how anyone can pretend this to be confirmed in any way.

 

Just want to throw out there that not all of us anons buy into the "helper/q-team" markers with potus tweets+comments here…

back on 4, i've seen anons get excited over posts i'd just made thinking they were getting special help (nope, just another anon, and quite the newfag at that point). I sure didn't burst their bubble, though, because why would i? They were happy and focused on work, so all good.

 

now, what i saw given as examples yesterday falls into that category somehow: comments unearthed seemed pretty constructive. But when it falls into "these posts are by POTUS" or anons heavily invested in this start to teach others that this is what Q meant by "learn the map", then it gets into dangerous/murky territory.

 

So yeah, as long as you're havin fun and not pushing this down any anon's throats, have at it, but still i'm glad to see it hasn't gotten that much traction, because that's just not what Q's markers established.

It still could be true, fair enough, i'm willing to go there, but it's all very uncertain, and not that necessary to clear up: anons are anons, judge by their fruit/use discernment, etc…

Anonymous ID: e30df5 Feb. 7, 2018, 8:07 a.m. No.294697   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>294506

wish i had moar time to help, spreadsheetanon, stellar work, important. Godspeed.

 

you shouldn't be bullied/pressured from posting asking help once in a while - lotsa garbage & filler in every bread, so there's plenty room for call like this!